+1
On 09.07.19 22:16, Udi Meiri wrote:
> +1 LGTM
>
> On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 4:54 PM Lukasz Cwik <lc...@google.com
> <mailto:lc...@google.com>> wrote:
>
> Thanks for taking a look. I followed up on your questions.
>
> On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 3:58 PM Udi Meiri <eh...@google.com
> <mailto:eh...@google.com>> wrote:
>
> I left some comments. Being new to the Beam releasing process,
> my question might be trivial to someone actually performing the
> release.
>
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 4:49 PM Lukasz Cwik <lc...@google.com
> <mailto:lc...@google.com>> wrote:
>
> Please vote based on the vendored dependencies release
> process as discussed[1] and documented[2].
>
> Please vote as follows:
> +1: Adopt the vendored dependency release process
> -1: The vendored release process needs to change because ...
>
> Since many people in the US may be out due to the holiday
> schedule, I'll try to close the vote and tally the results
> on July 9th so please vote before then.
>
> 1:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/e2c49a5efaee2ad416b083fbf3b9b6db60fdb04750208bfc34cecaf0@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
> 2: https://s.apache.org/beam-release-vendored-artifacts
>
