+1
On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 10:53 PM Pablo Estrada <pabl...@google.com> wrote: > > Thanks Luke for writing a thorough guide for this. > +1 > > On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 1:27 PM Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> On 09.07.19 22:16, Udi Meiri wrote: >> > +1 LGTM >> > >> > On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 4:54 PM Lukasz Cwik <lc...@google.com >> > <mailto:lc...@google.com>> wrote: >> > >> > Thanks for taking a look. I followed up on your questions. >> > >> > On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 3:58 PM Udi Meiri <eh...@google.com >> > <mailto:eh...@google.com>> wrote: >> > >> > I left some comments. Being new to the Beam releasing process, >> > my question might be trivial to someone actually performing the >> > release. >> > >> > On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 4:49 PM Lukasz Cwik <lc...@google.com >> > <mailto:lc...@google.com>> wrote: >> > >> > Please vote based on the vendored dependencies release >> > process as discussed[1] and documented[2]. >> > >> > Please vote as follows: >> > +1: Adopt the vendored dependency release process >> > -1: The vendored release process needs to change because ... >> > >> > Since many people in the US may be out due to the holiday >> > schedule, I'll try to close the vote and tally the results >> > on July 9th so please vote before then. >> > >> > 1: >> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/e2c49a5efaee2ad416b083fbf3b9b6db60fdb04750208bfc34cecaf0@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E >> > 2: https://s.apache.org/beam-release-vendored-artifacts >> > >>
