Thanks Luke for writing a thorough guide for this. +1 On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 1:27 PM Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 > > On 09.07.19 22:16, Udi Meiri wrote: > > +1 LGTM > > > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 4:54 PM Lukasz Cwik <lc...@google.com > > <mailto:lc...@google.com>> wrote: > > > > Thanks for taking a look. I followed up on your questions. > > > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 3:58 PM Udi Meiri <eh...@google.com > > <mailto:eh...@google.com>> wrote: > > > > I left some comments. Being new to the Beam releasing process, > > my question might be trivial to someone actually performing the > > release. > > > > On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 4:49 PM Lukasz Cwik <lc...@google.com > > <mailto:lc...@google.com>> wrote: > > > > Please vote based on the vendored dependencies release > > process as discussed[1] and documented[2]. > > > > Please vote as follows: > > +1: Adopt the vendored dependency release process > > -1: The vendored release process needs to change because ... > > > > Since many people in the US may be out due to the holiday > > schedule, I'll try to close the vote and tally the results > > on July 9th so please vote before then. > > > > 1: > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/e2c49a5efaee2ad416b083fbf3b9b6db60fdb04750208bfc34cecaf0@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E > > 2: https://s.apache.org/beam-release-vendored-artifacts > > > >
