Thank you for the quick responses. I sent out
https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/10743 to make this change. Please
provide feedback or directly edit the PR.

On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 3:58 PM Robert Bradshaw <rober...@google.com> wrote:

> Yes, yes, yes! This is the one model of release notes that I've
> actually seen work well at scale.
>
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/41e03ace17dbcccf7e267ba6d538736b2a99a8e73e7fb45702766b17%40%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
>
> Let's make it happen.
>
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 3:47 PM Robert Burke <rob...@frantil.com> wrote:
> >
> > I like this suggestion, Jira titles and commit summaries don't
> necessarily reflect the user impact for a given change (or set of changes).
> Being able to see the Forest instead of the trees.
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 31, 2020, 3:37 PM Kenneth Knowles <k...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> +1
> >>
> >> This is a great idea. Hope it can lead to higher-value view of relevant
> changes.
> >>
> >> I like it being in the root of the repo, so it lives next to the code.
> >>
> >> Since the website is also markdown, it could be copied over directly at
> release time, so it can be browsed there, too.
> >>
> >> Kenn
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 3:16 PM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> We currently have two major ways to communicate changes in a release:
> >>> - A blog post, to highlight major changes in the release. (Example for
> 2.17: [1])
> >>> - JIRA release notes pages listing all issues tagged for a specific
> release. (Example for 2.17 [2]).
> >>>
> >>> There are a few issues with this process:
> >>> - It is difficult for the release manager to know what is important,
> what is a breaking change, what is dependency change etc. For example,
> there were more than 150 Jira issues tagged for 2.17 release.
> >>> - Release blog has many items, and does not necessarily communicate
> important changes. It is difficult for users to discover major changes
> short of going through a large list.
> >>> - People involved in authoring or reviewing a PRs usually have the
> most context about the change, and they are not necessarily involved in the
> release process to provide this additional information.
> >>>
> >>> Would it be helpful if we maintain a simple change list file and
> update it as part of the PRs with noteworthy changes? Release managers
> could use this information as is in their blog posts (or link to it). Users
> will have a single place to find highlights from various versions.
> >>>
> >>> Concretely, I am proposing:
> >>> - Adding a CHANGES file to the root of the repository. (Name could be
> anything, TFX uses RELEASE.md in their repo. [3])
> >>> - Ask PR authors to update this file as part of their PR whenever it
> makes sense
> >>> - Reference this file during the release process, and a new section
> for the next release after each release.
> >>>
> >>> Ahmet
> >>>
> >>> [1] https://beam.apache.org/blog/2020/01/06/beam-2.17.0.html
> >>> [2]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12345970&projectId=12319527
> >>> [3] https://github.com/tensorflow/tfx/blob/master/RELEASE.md
>

Reply via email to