+1 for [3] On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 5:47 PM Robert Bradshaw <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 for [3] as well. > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 5:40 PM Ahmet Altay <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I agree with Kyle. [3] sounds more accurate. > > > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 3:00 PM Kyle Weaver <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> I prefer [3]. > >> > >> On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 10:53 AM Ning Kang <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi everyone, > >>> > >>> Last week, I sent a design doc and proposals in this email thread > about creating a JupyterLab extension for Interactive Beam. If you haven't > had a chance to look at it and you're interested in Interactive Beam, > please feel free to leave comments. > >>> > >>> Let's start a vote for the name of this extension to be used when > published to NPM. > >>> Here are some of the candidate names: > >>> [1] apache-beam-sidepanel > >>> [2] apache-beam-interactive-sidepanel > >>> [3] apache-beam-jupyterlab-sidepanel > >>> [4] <I don't like [1][2][3], my proposal is ${XXX}> > >>> > >>> > >>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority > approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes. > >>> > >>> Thanks! > >>> > >>> Ning. >
