+1 for 3. Thanks Ning. On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 10:54 AM Kenneth Knowles <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 for [3] > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 5:47 PM Robert Bradshaw <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> +1 for [3] as well. >> >> On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 5:40 PM Ahmet Altay <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > I agree with Kyle. [3] sounds more accurate. >> > >> > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 3:00 PM Kyle Weaver <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> I prefer [3]. >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 10:53 AM Ning Kang <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Hi everyone, >> >>> >> >>> Last week, I sent a design doc and proposals in this email thread >> about creating a JupyterLab extension for Interactive Beam. If you haven't >> had a chance to look at it and you're interested in Interactive Beam, >> please feel free to leave comments. >> >>> >> >>> Let's start a vote for the name of this extension to be used when >> published to NPM. >> >>> Here are some of the candidate names: >> >>> [1] apache-beam-sidepanel >> >>> [2] apache-beam-interactive-sidepanel >> >>> [3] apache-beam-jupyterlab-sidepanel >> >>> [4] <I don't like [1][2][3], my proposal is ${XXX}> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by >> majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes. >> >>> >> >>> Thanks! >> >>> >> >>> Ning. >> >
