>
> Am wondering whether that gets confusing, if it will also be used in
> datalab, and/or other (similar/same underlying tech but going by different
> names)?
>

The package would only work with JupyterLab. If similar tech such as
datalab needs this, we'll have to create a new package tailored for it.

On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 12:46 PM Austin Bennett <[email protected]>
wrote:

> if specific to jupyterlab, then [3] makes sense.  Am wondering whether
> that gets confusing, if it will also be used in datalab, and/or other
> (similar/same underlying tech but going by different names)?
>
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 12:35 PM Pablo Estrada <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> +1 for 3. Thanks Ning.
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 10:54 AM Kenneth Knowles <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 for [3]
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 5:47 PM Robert Bradshaw <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 for [3] as well.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 5:40 PM Ahmet Altay <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > I agree with Kyle. [3] sounds more accurate.
>>>> >
>>>> > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 3:00 PM Kyle Weaver <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> I prefer [3].
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 10:53 AM Ning Kang <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Hi everyone,
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Last week, I sent a design doc and proposals in this email thread
>>>> about creating a JupyterLab extension for Interactive Beam. If you haven't
>>>> had a chance to look at it and you're interested in Interactive Beam,
>>>> please feel free to leave comments.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Let's start a vote for the name of this extension to be used when
>>>> published to NPM.
>>>> >>> Here are some of the candidate names:
>>>> >>> [1] apache-beam-sidepanel
>>>> >>> [2] apache-beam-interactive-sidepanel
>>>> >>> [3] apache-beam-jupyterlab-sidepanel
>>>> >>> [4] <I don't like [1][2][3], my proposal is ${XXX}>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
>>>> majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Thanks!
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Ning.
>>>>
>>>

Reply via email to