+1 with GH discussion. If Airflow can do this https://github.com/apache/airflow/discussions, I think we can do this as well.
On Mon, Jul 3, 2023 at 9:51 AM Alexey Romanenko <aromanenko....@gmail.com> wrote: > -1 > I understand that for some people, who maybe are not very familiar with > ASF and its “Apache Way” [1], it may sound a bit obsolete but mailing lists > are one of the key things of every ASF project which Apache Beam is. Having > user@, dev@ and commits@ lists are required for ASF project to maintain > the open discussions that are publicly accessible and archived in the same > way for all ASF projects. > > I just wanted to remind a key motto at Apache Software Foundation is: > *“If it didn't happen on the mailing list, it didn't happen.”* > > — > Alexey > > [1] https://apache.org/theapacheway/index.html > > On 1 Jul 2023, at 19:54, Anand Inguva via dev <dev@beam.apache.org> wrote: > > +1 for GitHub discussions as well. But I am also little concerned about > multiple places for discussions. As Danny said, if we have a good plan on > how to move forward on how/when to archive the current mailing list, that > would be great. > > Thanks, > Anand > > On Sat, Jul 1, 2023, 3:21 AM Damon Douglas <douglas.da...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I'm very strong +1 for replacing the use of Email with GitHub >> Discussions. Thank you for bringing this up. >> >> On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 7:38 AM Danny McCormick via dev < >> dev@beam.apache.org> wrote: >> >>> Thanks for starting this discussion! >>> >>> I'm a weak -1 for this proposal. While I think that GH Discussions can >>> be a good forum, I think most of the things that Discussions do are covered >>> by some combination of the dev/user lists and GitHub issues, and the net >>> outcome of this will be creating one more forum to pay attention to. I know >>> in the past we've had a hard time keeping up with Stack overflow questions >>> for a similar reason. With that said, I'm not opposed to trying it out and >>> experimenting as long as we have (a) clear criteria for understanding if >>> the change is effective or not (can be subjective), (b) a clear idea of >>> when we'd revisit the discussion, and (c) a clear path to rollback the >>> decision without it being *too *much work (this might mean something >>> like disabling future discussions and keeping the history or somehow moving >>> the history to the dev or user list). If we do this, I also think we should >>> update https://beam.apache.org/community/contact-us/ with a clear >>> taxonomy of what goes where (this is what I'm unsure of today). >>> >>> FWIW, if we were proposing cutting either the user list or both the user >>> and dev list in favor of discussions, I would be +1. I do think the >>> advantages of discussions over email are real (threaded, easy to convert >>> to/from issues, markdown, one place for all things Beam). >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Danny >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 10:23 AM Svetak Sundhar via dev < >>> dev@beam.apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> I wanted to start a discussion to gauge interest on enabling Github >>>> Discussions <https://docs.github.com/en/discussions/quickstart> in >>>> Apache Beam. >>>> >>>> Pros: >>>> + GH Discussions allows for folks to get unblocked on small/medium >>>> implementation blocker (Google employees can often get this help by >>>> scheduling a call with teammates whereas there is a larger barrier for >>>> non-Google employees to get this help). >>>> + On the above point, more visibility into the development blockers >>>> that others have previously faced. >>>> + GH Discussions is more discoverable and approachable for new users >>>> and contributors. >>>> + A centralized place to have discussions. Long term, it makes sense to >>>> eventually fully migrate to GH Discussions. >>>> >>>> Cons: >>>> - For a period of time when we use both the dev list and GH >>>> Discussions, context can be confusing. >>>> - Anything else? >>>> >>>> To be clear, I’m not advocating that we move off the dev list >>>> immediately. I propose that over time we slowly start moving discussions >>>> over to GH discussions, utilizing things such as the poll feature. >>>> >>>> I am aware that the Airflow project [1] uses both GH Discussions today >>>> and a dev@ list [2] today. >>>> >>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/airflow/discussions >>>> [2] https://lists.apache.org/list.html?d...@airflow.apache.org >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Svetak Sundhar >>>> Data Engineer >>>> s <nellywil...@google.com>vetaksund...@google.com >>>> >>>> >
