The third release candidate is now available for everyone's review [1], which should be incorporating all feedback so far.
Please comment if there's additional feedback, as we are about to start the voting process. [1] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1002 On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 12:10 PM, P. Taylor Goetz <ptgo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for the clarification JB. In the projects I’ve been involved with, > I’ve not seen that practice. > > As long as the resulting release ends up on dist.a.o I don’t think it’s a > problem. > > -Taylor > > > > On Jun 8, 2016, at 12:49 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> > wrote: > > > > Hi Taylor, > > > > Just to be clearn, in most other projects, we stage the distributions on > repository. We upload the distro and signatures to dist.apache.org only > when the vote passed. > > > > Basically, the release process I talked with Davor (and that I will > document) is: > > - Tag and stage using mvn release:prepare release:perform > > - Close repo > > - Start vote > > - If passed, forward vote to incubator > > - If passed, close repo > > - Upload distro to dist > > - Announce the release (mailing lists, website) > > > > It's based on what I do in Karaf, ServiceMix, etc. > > > > Regards > > JB > > > > On 06/08/2016 02:39 AM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > >> Out of curiosity, is there a reason for distributing the release on > repository.a.o vs. dist.a.o? > >> > >> In my experience repository.a.o has traditionally been used for maven > artifacts, and dist.a.o has been for release artifacts (source archives and > convenience binaries). > >> > >> I'd be happy to help with documenting the process. > >> > >> I ask because this might come up during an IPMC release vote. > >> > >> -Taylor > >> > >>> On Jun 1, 2016, at 9:46 PM, Davor Bonaci <da...@google.com.INVALID> > wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi everyone! > >>> We've started the release process for our first release, > 0.1.0-incubating. > >>> > >>> To recap previous discussions, we don't have particular functional > goals > >>> for this release. Instead, we'd like to make available what's > currently in > >>> the repository, as well as work through the release process. > >>> > >>> With this in mind, we've: > >>> * branched off the release branch [1] at master's commit 8485272, > >>> * updated master to prepare for the second release, 0.2.0-incubating, > >>> * built the first release candidate, RC1, and deployed it to a staging > >>> repository [2]. > >>> > >>> We are not ready to start a vote just yet -- we've already identified > a few > >>> issues worth fixing. That said, I'd like to invite everybody to take a > peek > >>> and comment. I'm hoping we can address as many issues as possible > before we > >>> start the voting process. > >>> > >>> Please let us know if you see any issues. > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Davor > >>> > >>> [1] > https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam/tree/release-0.1.0-incubating > >>> [2] > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1000/ > > > > -- > > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > > jbono...@apache.org > > http://blog.nanthrax.net > > Talend - http://www.talend.com > >
