On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 5:14 AM, Gary Martin <[email protected]>wrote:
> On 03/04/13 12:42, Marco Mangiante wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Any way, sate is inconsistent now in installation procedure - bhsearch >>> should be mentioned (or not mentioned) in both files requirements.txt >>> and bloodhound_setup.py otherwise installation fails always. What can >>> we do with this? New release? >>> >>> Cheers, Andrej >>> >> in my opinion if it is possible is better a new release: the installation >> guide is now not updated for the 0.5.2 . If not possible, maybe we can >> modify the page https://issues.apache.org/**bloodhound/wiki/** >> BloodhoundInstall<https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/wiki/BloodhoundInstall>to >> report these changes (bhsearch manual installation and "virtualenv >> --system-site-packages bloodhound" if you install with apt). >> >> >> Marco >> >> > > The wiki page is already updated to mention the manual install of search > for 0.5.2 and I will look at improving the psycopg installation discussion > in a bit. There is also now https://issues.apache.org/** > bloodhound/ticket/493 <https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/493>for > the problem with search being required. > > Cheers, > Gary > It sounds like I should put together a 0.5.3 release this weekend. I'm assuming that it will need to be voted on, the same as any other release.
