On 8 April 2013 11:05, Marco Mangiante <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello, > > I've done some testing to reproduce the failures and then committed the > > suggested fixes. Everything looks good to me now, but I'll wait until > > morning to push out the release and call for a vote in case someone sees > > something I might have missed. > > > > The biggest failure here is that I as the release manager I didn't test > > that installation steps could be executed correctly. I had only tested > the > > ability to install a development instance. I'll add some steps to the > > release process to cover a basic smoke test prior to release. > > I've seen that previously there is another list for "users" but never seen > messages on it. Maybe we can transfer the comments about the released > packages on that and so differenziate the development install from the > "release" install. > What do you think? > Only one question: there is still a "user" list? :-) > > --Regards, > Marco Mangiante I think this still belongs on this list. The users@ list is more useful for users who don't want to subscribe to all the dev@ noise (from their perspective) and generally ask implementation questions. At this point in our growth we should encourage as many as possible to engage on dev@ though. Cheers, Joe -- Joe Dreimann | *User Experience Designer* | WANdisco<http://www.wandisco.com/> @jdreimann <https://twitter.com/jdreimann>
