On 04.04.2013 09:56, Ryan Ollos wrote: > On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 5:14 AM, Gary Martin <[email protected]>wrote: > >> On 03/04/13 12:42, Marco Mangiante wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> Any way, sate is inconsistent now in installation procedure - bhsearch >>>> should be mentioned (or not mentioned) in both files requirements.txt >>>> and bloodhound_setup.py otherwise installation fails always. What can >>>> we do with this? New release? >>>> >>>> Cheers, Andrej >>>> >>> in my opinion if it is possible is better a new release: the installation >>> guide is now not updated for the 0.5.2 . If not possible, maybe we can >>> modify the page https://issues.apache.org/**bloodhound/wiki/** >>> BloodhoundInstall<https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/wiki/BloodhoundInstall>to >>> report these changes (bhsearch manual installation and "virtualenv >>> --system-site-packages bloodhound" if you install with apt). >>> >>> >>> Marco >>> >>> >> The wiki page is already updated to mention the manual install of search >> for 0.5.2 and I will look at improving the psycopg installation discussion >> in a bit. There is also now https://issues.apache.org/** >> bloodhound/ticket/493 <https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/493>for >> the problem with search being required. >> >> Cheers, >> Gary >> > It sounds like I should put together a 0.5.3 release this weekend. I'm > assuming that it will need to be voted on, the same as any other release.
You assume correctly. But don't release from trunk, just merge the relevant fixes onto the 0.5.x branch and release from there. This is a bugfix release, not a feature release. -- Brane -- Branko Čibej Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
