Hi, all. Any further comments/votes on this? (mentors?)
This has been open for best part of 72 hours now, so if no further comments by Friday morning (UTC+1) I'll assume consensus and put this into action. Cheers Richard. On 9 June 2014 23:39, Richard Downer <[email protected]> wrote: > All, > > Following our earlier proposal for source code contributions using > GitHub, here is a revised position which reflects our mentor's advice. > > TL;DR - it's similar to the last one, except that the normal working > mirror will be https://github.com/apache/incubator-brooklyn, and no > other GitHub organisations are involved. > > The process for contributors is described here: > https://people.apache.org/~richard/community/how-to-contribute.html > [Note that this URL is temporary, until docs go live at our official web site] > > In short, contributors submit PRs against > https://github.com/apache/incubator-brooklyn, the remainder of the > document describes some best practices and an explanation of the > review process as a contributor would see it. > > The process for committers is described here: > https://people.apache.org/~richard/community/committers.html > [Note that this URL is temporary, until docs go live at our official web site] > > This documents a workflow that involves setting up a local repository > that refers to both the canonical Apache repository > (https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-brooklyn.git) and > the GitHub mirror, and describes how to merge pull requests from > GitHub mirror and push them to the canonical repo. > > > Any comments / votes? > > Thanks > > Richard.
