+1 on the source package, then.
Rhett
On Oct 6, 2009, at 10:01 PM, Alex Boisvert wrote:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Rhett Sutphin <[email protected]
>wrote:
Does an up vote on these endorse
http://people.apache.org/~boisvert/buildr/1.3.5/dist/
buildr-1.3.5.gem<http://people.apache.org/%7Eboisvert/buildr/1.3.5/dist/buildr-1.3.5.gem
>
? I ask because it is missing the classes compiled by `rake
compile`.
They do compile correctly from the source tgz.
Total party foul. They should have been part of the package.
Apparently
staging didn't produce the same gems as "rake gem". I'll look into
it.
The vote only applies to the source packaging.
alex
