I've updated the binary packages (now include .class files) and tested fresh install of .gem works on some large real-world projects. The original source packages remain untouched.
As an added bonus, I found a machine where rcov doesn't segfault so the updated site has full test coverage reports: http://people.apache.org/~boisvert/buildr/1.3.5/site/coverage/ alex On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:31 PM, Rhett Sutphin <[email protected]>wrote: > +1 on the source package, then. > > Rhett > > On Oct 6, 2009, at 10:01 PM, Alex Boisvert wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Rhett Sutphin <[email protected] >> >wrote: >> >> Does an up vote on these endorse >>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~boisvert/buildr/1.3.5/dist/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eboisvert/buildr/1.3.5/dist/> >>> buildr-1.3.5.gem< >>> http://people.apache.org/%7Eboisvert/buildr/1.3.5/dist/buildr-1.3.5.gem> >>> >>> ? I ask because it is missing the classes compiled by `rake compile`. >>> They do compile correctly from the source tgz. >>> >>> >> Total party foul. They should have been part of the package. Apparently >> staging didn't produce the same gems as "rake gem". I'll look into it. >> >> The vote only applies to the source packaging. >> >> alex >> > >
