> I was initially thinking about do_first and do_last but though the "do" was > redundant with Ruby's do ... end notation. Do you think that's better?
Not greatly. Maybe firstly and lastly? task(:foo).firstly do # block will be executed before 'enhance' blocks end task(:foo).lastly do # block will be executed after 'enhance' blocks end That way it does not double up the "do" word and doesn't look like an enumeration. -- Cheers, Peter Donald
