On Wednesday, November 17, 2010, Peter Donald <[email protected]> wrote: >> I was initially thinking about do_first and do_last but though the "do" was >> redundant with Ruby's do ... end notation. Do you think that's better? > > Not greatly. Maybe firstly and lastly? > > task(:foo).firstly do > # block will be executed before 'enhance' blocks > end > > task(:foo).lastly do > # block will be executed after 'enhance' blocks > end > > That way it does not double up the "do" word and doesn't look like an > enumeration.
I like that. alex
