If I was release manager for 1.18, it’s possible that I used ‘mvn’ rather than 
‘./mvnw’. I don’t recall. If so, my bad, I should have updated the release 
instructions.

Julian

On Mar 14, 2019, at 7:22 PM, Kevin Risden <kris...@apache.org> wrote:

>> 
>> maven-wrapper.jar is a binary file, and we cannot have binary files in
>> source distributions. (Note that ./mvnw can bootstrap just fine without it.
>> Also note that it is not checked into git — I guess it is created during
>> the release build process.)
>> 
> 
> Hmmm that is interesting. ./mvnw downloads the
> .mvn/wrapper/maven-wrapper.jar file. The release steps say to use ./mvnw
> (ie: ./mvnw -DskipTests -Papache-release release:perform 2>&1 | tee
> /tmp/perform.log) so not sure if there is something I need to do
> differently or needs to be figured out to ensure the .mvn directory is not
> included in the source distribution.
> 
> Kevin Risden
> 
> 
>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 8:56 PM Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>> 
>> PS Huge thank you to Kevin for being release manager. This has been one of
>> our most complex releases, and I know that Kevin has put in a massive
>> effort to get the release this far. I hope the process is over soon!
>> 
>>> On Mar 14, 2019, at 5:51 PM, Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> -1 due to .mvn/wrapper/maven-wrapper.jar
>>> 
>>> maven-wrapper.jar is a binary file, and we cannot have binary files in
>> source distributions. (Note that ./mvnw can bootstrap just fine without it.
>> Also note that it is not checked into git — I guess it is created during
>> the release build process.)
>>> 
>>> Everything else was fine. Checked hashes, KEYS, LICENSE, NOTICE, README;
>> checked that contents of tar match git; compiled and ran tests using JDK 11
>> on Ubuntu linux.
>>> 
>>> Julian
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Mar 14, 2019, at 10:30 AM, Vladimir Sitnikov <
>> sitnikov.vladi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>> 
>>>> Checksum matches, the code compiles.
>>>> Release notes look ok.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks, Kevin
>>>> 
>>>> Vladimir
>>> 
>> 
>> 

Reply via email to