The web site process is not broken. There are some minor licensing bugs. Let’s fix them. Let’s talk about how we can improve the process. The existence of bugs doesn’t mean the process is broken.
The release manager must review the licensing/security reports. People reviewing the release can run those same reports (e.g. people run RAT today on release artifacts). Those reports don’t necessarily need to be published. Julian > On Jul 2, 2019, at 12:09 PM, Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov.vladi...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Julian>And if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. > > It is broken. Both Avatica and Calcite releases violate ASF licensing > policy (at least as per https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html definition > of that) > > Julian>This change would be adding another thing for people voting on > releases to review > > Do you suggest people should NOT review licensing/security reports for ASF > releases? > > Vladimir
