Thanks Vladimir. Most of the changes look find to me (left a small comment
in PR)

Once merged, I'll take care of remaining JUnit4 rules for
Cassandra/ElasticSearch/Mongo etc.


On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 1:23 PM Vladimir Sitnikov <
sitnikov.vladi...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Ok, I think PR1621 is ready to go:
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/1621
> I'm inclined to merge it shortly
>
> The PR converts most of the tests, and by default, it allows JUnit5 only.
>
> Certain modules still have "non-trivial" JUnit4 code, and there was an
> agreement to convert them later.
> The modules receive junit4 dependency via junit4=true in gradle.properties.
>
> ---
>
> The most "controversial" change from my point of view is the removal of
> *Suite* classes.
> In other words, I have dropped classes like
> CalciteSuite, FileSuite, PlusSuite, and so on.
>
> I guess it is OK, as both Gradle and JUnit5 provide lots of ways to launch
> tests (e.g. tags are good).
> The good thing about the removal is it would reduce the number of
> merge-conflicts,
> and it would simplify adding new test classes.
>
> ---
>
> The most notable difference between junit4 and junit5 .assert* is that
> junit4 has (message, expected, actual)
> argument order while junit5 uses (expected, actual, message).
> The latter is better when message is big (e.g. concatenated), and junit5
> allows to use lambda,
> so the message is built only when assertion fails.
>
> I've performed argument shuffling with IntelliJ IDEA's "structural search
> and replace", so it should be OK.
>
> Vladimir
>

Reply via email to