We still need 5 committers to review 5 PRs each. Please reply to this email to volunteer.
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 3:41 PM Stamatis Zampetakis <zabe...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I agree with Julian, we should get the 1.27.0 out as soon as possible. > > I can try to prepare RC0 between the 28 and 30 of May, if people agree on > this. > Alternatively, I will have a bit more time around 17 to 20 of June. > > I will try to get 2-3 PRs in before starting the RC. > > Best, > Stamatis > > > On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 9:15 PM Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Now Avatica 1.18 has been released (thanks, Francis!) we should press on > > with Calcite 1.27. > > > > Who is release manager? Stamatis, You volunteered to be release manager > > for 1.27 [1] but I would be happy to jump in. Let me know. > > > > There is a backlog of PRs that look good enough to go into 1.27. How to > > tackle these? I think we need 4 or 5 committers to each look over 4 or 5 > > PRs in the next few days. Please reply to this email if you are prepared to > > help. > > > > Julian > > > > [1] > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/re5702a648df18f56e786d770cdce86101164ae419eee94ae947652d4%40%3Cdev.calcite.apache.org%3E > > > > On 2021/03/09 14:29:16, Stamatis Zampetakis <zabe...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Many thanks for moving this forward Julian, much appreciated. > > > > > > At the moment the main blocker is the Avatica release ([1,2]) that in > > turn > > > waits for CALCITE-4503 [3]. > > > It would be great if somebody has some cycles to review and merge the > > > respective PR [4]. > > > > > > Best, > > > Stamatis > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4528 > > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4488 > > > [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4503 > > > [4] https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica/pull/138 > > > > > > On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 2:22 AM Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > Vladimir, > > > > > > > > Thanks for finding this bug. Please log it. > > > > > > > > I don't intend to fix any more bugs in this area before 1.27. It has > > > > been a huge effort on my part, and I have not received any help from > > > > anyone. > > > > > > > > Julian > > > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 3:57 PM Vladimir Sitnikov > > > > <sitnikov.vladi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for pushing this forward. > > > > > > > > > > Would you please add search/sarg shrinking to RexShrinker? > > > > > > > > > > There are failures though: > > > > > > > > > > @Test void singleFuzzyTest() { > > > > > Random r = new Random(); > > > > > r.setSeed(6321443803263498676L); > > > > > RexFuzzer fuzzer = new RexFuzzer(rexBuilder, typeFactory); > > > > > generateRexAndCheckTrueFalse(fuzzer, r); > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > yields > > > > > > > > > > $node isAlwaysTrue, so it should simplify to TRUE unknownAsFalse > > > > > > > > > > SEARCH(-(COALESCE(?0.int0, CASE(=(CASE(false, SEARCH(?0.notNullInt0, > > > > > Sarg[(0..2]; NULL AS FALSE]), true), NOT(IS NOT TRUE(false))), > > > > -(+(100500), > > > > > -(CASE(true, 1, 100500), CASE(=(?0.notNullBool0, ?0.notNullBool0), > > > > > null:INTEGER, ?0.notNullInt1))), CASE(=(COALESCE(0, ?0.int1), 1), 1, > > > > > =(COALESCE(0, ?0.int1), -(null, ?0.int1)), CASE(?0.notNullBool0, > > > > > COALESCE(?0.int0, ?0.int1), -(null:INTEGER, null:INTEGER)), > > > > null:INTEGER)), > > > > > +(*(COALESCE(COALESCE(1, -2038957448, 0), CASE(false, ?0.int0, > > > > > null:INTEGER), COALESCE(?0.notNullInt0, null:INTEGER, null:INTEGER, > > -1), > > > > > COALESCE(0, 933814882, ?0.int0)), COALESCE(+(100500), CASE(?0.bool1, > > > > > ?0.notNullInt0, null:INTEGER))))), CASE(=(-(null:INTEGER), 100500), > > > > > COALESCE(-(-(CASE(=(?0.bool0, ?0.notNullBool1), ?0.notNullInt1, > > > > > null:INTEGER), ?0.notNullInt0)), +(COALESCE(-(-1), ?0.notNullInt1, > > > > > -(null:INTEGER, null:INTEGER))), CASE(=(OR(?0.bool0, ?0.bool1, > > false), > > > > > <(true, ?0.notNullBool0)), -(+(null:INTEGER)), =(OR(?0.bool0, > > ?0.bool1, > > > > > false), SEARCH(null:INTEGER, Sarg[TRUE])), CASE(=(-1, null), > > > > > CASE(=(?0.notNullBool1, ?0.bool0), 1135316986, null:INTEGER), =(-1, > > 1), > > > > > +(null:INTEGER), =(-1, 100500), -(1), +(?0.notNullInt1, > > ?0.notNullInt0)), > > > > > COALESCE(-(null:INTEGER), CASE(true, 100500, null:INTEGER), > > *(1994412942, > > > > > null))), CASE(=(IS UNKNOWN(?0.notNullBool0), IS NOT > > > > > UNKNOWN(?0.notNullBool1)), +(?0.notNullInt1), =(IS > > > > > UNKNOWN(?0.notNullBool0), IS DISTINCT FROM(?0.notNullInt1, 1)), > > -(null, > > > > > +(-1)), =(IS UNKNOWN(?0.notNullBool0), >(false, true)), +(-(null, > > > > ?0.int1), > > > > > *(100500, ?0.int0)), CASE(=(?0.bool0, false), +(-1, 100500), > > > > *(-1236110720, > > > > > ?0.int0)))), =(-(null:INTEGER), +(+(COALESCE(?0.int0, null:INTEGER, > > > > > null:INTEGER, ?0.notNullInt0)))), ?0.notNullInt1, 100500)), Sarg[=]) > > > > > > > > > > Actual :IS NOT NULL(-(COALESCE(?0.int0, CASE(=(CASE(false, > > > > > SEARCH(?0.notNullInt0, Sarg[(0..2]; NULL AS FALSE]), true), NOT(IS > > NOT > > > > > TRUE(false))), -(+(100500), -(CASE(true, 1, 100500), > > > > > CASE(=(?0.notNullBool0, ?0.notNullBool0), null:INTEGER, > > > > ?0.notNullInt1))), > > > > > CASE(=(COALESCE(0, ?0.int1), 1), 1, =(COALESCE(0, ?0.int1), -(null, > > > > > ?0.int1)), CASE(?0.notNullBool0, COALESCE(?0.int0, ?0.int1), > > > > > -(null:INTEGER, null:INTEGER)), null:INTEGER)), > > +(*(COALESCE(COALESCE(1, > > > > > -2038957448, 0), CASE(false, ?0.int0, null:INTEGER), > > > > > COALESCE(?0.notNullInt0, null:INTEGER, null:INTEGER, -1), COALESCE(0, > > > > > 933814882, ?0.int0)), COALESCE(+(100500), CASE(?0.bool1, > > ?0.notNullInt0, > > > > > null:INTEGER))))), CASE(=(-(null:INTEGER), 100500), > > > > > COALESCE(-(-(CASE(=(?0.bool0, ?0.notNullBool1), ?0.notNullInt1, > > > > > null:INTEGER), ?0.notNullInt0)), +(COALESCE(-(-1), ?0.notNullInt1, > > > > > -(null:INTEGER, null:INTEGER))), CASE(=(OR(?0.bool0, ?0.bool1, > > false), > > > > > <(true, ?0.notNullBool0)), -(+(null:INTEGER)), =(OR(?0.bool0, > > ?0.bool1, > > > > > false), SEARCH(null:INTEGER, Sarg[TRUE])), CASE(=(-1, null), > > > > > CASE(=(?0.notNullBool1, ?0.bool0), 1135316986, null:INTEGER), =(-1, > > 1), > > > > > +(null:INTEGER), =(-1, 100500), -(1), +(?0.notNullInt1, > > ?0.notNullInt0)), > > > > > COALESCE(-(null:INTEGER), CASE(true, 100500, null:INTEGER), > > *(1994412942, > > > > > null))), CASE(=(IS UNKNOWN(?0.notNullBool0), IS NOT > > > > > UNKNOWN(?0.notNullBool1)), +(?0.notNullInt1), =(IS > > > > > UNKNOWN(?0.notNullBool0), IS DISTINCT FROM(?0.notNullInt1, 1)), > > -(null, > > > > > +(-1)), =(IS UNKNOWN(?0.notNullBool0), >(false, true)), +(-(null, > > > > ?0.int1), > > > > > *(100500, ?0.int0)), CASE(=(?0.bool0, false), +(-1, 100500), > > > > *(-1236110720, > > > > > ?0.int0)))), =(-(null:INTEGER), +(+(COALESCE(?0.int0, null:INTEGER, > > > > > null:INTEGER, ?0.notNullInt0)))), ?0.notNullInt1, 100500))) > > > > > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.calcite.test.fuzzer.RexProgramFuzzyTest.checkUnknownAs(RexProgramFuzzyTest.java:251) > > > > > > > > > > Vladimir > > > > > > > > >
