I’m working hard on 4446. It may still be a few days.

> On Feb 21, 2021, at 1:00 PM, Stamatis Zampetakis <zabe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> At the moment we are mainly waiting for CALCITE-4446 [1], CALCITE-4488 [2],
> for preparing the first RC for 1.27.0.
> 
> I know that some people started testing the current master (thanks!) and it
> would be great if others start doing so as soon as possible in order to
> have a smooth release.
> If testing with master is not feasible, testing with 1.26.0 and providing
> feedback (positive or negative) can also help a lot.
> 
> Best,
> Stamatis
> 
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4446>[1]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4446
> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4488
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 10:36 AM Stamatis Zampetakis <zabe...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> OK so if I understand well for the next release we should aim to finish
>> CALCITE-4446, CALCITE-4405, and CALCITE-4487.
>> 
>> It would be good if people can test 1.26.0 or the current master now so
>> that we can see what else needs to be done for 1.27.0.
>> 
>> Best,
>> Stamatis
>> 
>> On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 9:46 AM Vladimir Sitnikov <
>> sitnikov.vladi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Julian>because we never had a test case that indicated how actual behavior
>>> differed from desired behavior
>>> 
>>> One of the tests has been included in Calcite sources for a while. Please
>>> refer to RexProgramFuzzyTest that I previously highlighted in
>>> "Search/Sarg: untested feature merged to the default branch" thread:
>>> 
>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rce6e84d0e0cd5a227d64c9f670b43650833f43e0cbccb80e04f5e0cf%40%3Cdev.calcite.apache.org%3E
>>> 
>>> Note: I believe "Sarg feature" should have been accompanied by the
>>> relevant
>>> additions to RefFuzzer, RexShrinker, and RexInterpreter as a part of the
>>> test
>>> coverage.
>>> Under the current implementation, users can't avoid/disable SEARCH/Sarg,
>>> and it is enabled by default, so the feature must come with tests.
>>> 
>>> Vladimir
>>> 
>> 

Reply via email to