Thank you all for the feedback. I committed the change for Calcite [1] and Avatica [2]. I checked locally and things seemed to work fine. I published the Calcite website with the changes today so if you notice any problems please let me know.
Best, Stamatis [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/7f5e9b8b7e6b4afd8e4f21524aa3c4ce8b7ddb61 [2] https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica/commit/e4f22c33c5a67257056ee4428486b900cc139038 On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 12:20 AM Francis Chuang <francischu...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 for removing those 2 scripts. They are for compatibility with very > old browsers that have been discontinued for many years, so it makes > sense to reduce the bloat. > > Francis > > On 3/06/2021 5:25 am, Julian Hyde wrote: > > +0 to remove them entirely, if that is possible. > > > > -1 to keep in git but remove from source releases. We are already in > > compliance with Apache policy, best I can tell. > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 12:08 PM Haisheng Yuan <hy...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > >> +1 for removing them entirely. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Haisheng Yuan > >> > >> On 2021/06/02 13:36:05, Alessandro Solimando < > alessandro.solima...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> Hi all, > >>> +1 for removing them as well, all the mentioned sw versions in [5,6] > >>> are extremely, extremely old. > >>> > >>> Best regards, > >>> Alessandro > >>> > >>> On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 at 14:38, Michael Mior <mm...@apache.org> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> +1 for removing these entirely. I don't believe they are currently > necessary. > >>>> -- > >>>> Michael Mior > >>>> mm...@apache.org > >>>> > >>>> Le mer. 2 juin 2021 à 06:13, Stamatis Zampetakis <zabe...@gmail.com> > a écrit : > >>>>> > >>>>> Hi all, > >>>>> > >>>>> In the recent votes for Calcite [1] and Avatica [2] there were some > -1 > >>>>> votes regarding minified javascript files present in the source > releases. > >>>>> > >>>>> The concerns are raised for the following files: > >>>>> site/js/html5shiv.min.js > >>>>> site/js/respond.min.js > >>>>> > >>>>> From discussions in other lists it seems that there are Apache > source > >>>>> releases including minified files so I don't think we are violating > any > >>>>> policy by including them but there are deferring opinions on this > topic > >>>>> [3,4]. > >>>>> > >>>>> To avoid bringing back the discussion to if minified javascript > should be > >>>>> present or not I would like to propose one of the following > alternatives: > >>>>> > >>>>> 1. It seems that both of the aforementioned scripts [5,6] are used > for > >>>>> compatibility reasons with old browsers. I think most of the people > are not > >>>>> using these browsers anymore so I would suggest removing them > altogether > >>>>> from the code. > >>>>> > >>>>> 2. If for some reason we need to keep them then we could directly > use the > >>>>> non minified version. The difference of minified vs unminified for > both > >>>>> files is ~6KB so I doubt it will have any real impact with the > internet > >>>>> connections that we use nowadays. > >>>>> > >>>>> What do you think? > >>>>> > >>>>> Best, > >>>>> Stamatis > >>>>> > >>>>> [1] > >>>>> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r049cf5b953eb5824ba37df21094dd7c1e92146d659db4735ad121593%40%3Cdev.calcite.apache.org%3E > >>>>> [2] > >>>>> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r074720fc062bde09a7e69dc77f77754c7fd4c22f1357514f6b2196d0%40%3Cdev.calcite.apache.org%3E > >>>>> [3] > >>>>> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rcddc30dd1f0c7f20709e09de7202d4d6885d6235a7fce1c1ab46e4ed%40%3Clegal-discuss.apache.org%3E > >>>>> [4] > >>>>> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201805.mbox/%3c89a47c0b-e74e-4571-b282-dbe505291...@classsoftware.com%3e > >>>>> [5] https://github.com/scottjehl/Respond > >>>>> [6] https://github.com/aFarkas/html5shiv > >>> >