Thanks Benchao for opening the discussion! I'd like to include CALCITE-5923/CALCITE-5825/CALCITE-5826 in 1.36, and they're all in good shape. The first one improves test converage for `SqlOperatorTest`, and can avoid later regressions, so it's valuable. The last two Jiras add two useful Spark/Hive functions, and have already reviewd for one round, and need additional +1 review from the committer. And I am willing to participate in the review of the remaining PRs of 1.36.0. Best Regards, Runkang He
LakeShen <shenleifight...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月15日周日 17:33写道： > According to the JIRA information to be fixed or supported in 1.36.0, I > compiled the PR information that currently requires the committer review or > secondary review, so that these PRs could be merged.If the committer has > time,could help review these PRs. > > The PRs are: > 1. https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3462 > 2. https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3459 > 3. https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3463 > 4. https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3436 > 5. https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3458 > 6. https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3390 > 7. https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3326 > 8. https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3213 > 9. https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3433 > 10. https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3467 > 11. https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3442 > 12. https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3470 > 13. https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3439 > 14. https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3177 > > > Best, > LakeShen > > Mihai Budiu <mbu...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月15日周日 12:32写道： > > > I have a fix for the regression 5990, but I have also filed an improved > > fix for 5921 [1] which is needed to implement the fix for 5990. Both are > > relatively small so we should be able to get them in for 1.36. > > > > Thank you for your patience. > > Mihai > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3471 > > ________________________________ > > From: Benchao Li <libenc...@apache.org> > > Sent: Saturday, October 7, 2023 8:01 PM > > To: dev@calcite.apache.org <dev@calcite.apache.org> > > Cc: mbu...@gmail.com <mbu...@gmail.com> > > Subject: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0 > > > > It's been a bit more than 2 months since our last release [1] and > > there are currently 90+ new commits in main branch. > > > > As usual, according to our Jira dashboard [2] and Github [3], there > > are many pending issues that could / should be part of the release. > > I'd propose to make a collective effort to try to clean up our 1.36 > > backlog and merge the PRs which are in a good state. I'd propose to > > aim for **end of October** to release 1.36.0, this will give us about > > 20 days to clean up pending PRs for next version. What do you think? > > > > According to [4], the following release managers would be: > > - 1.36.0 Benchao Li > > - 1.37.0 Sergey Nuyanzin > > - 1.38.0 Julian Hyde > > > > So I'm supposed to be the release manager for 1.36.0 > > > > And contributors, if you have any work that is in good shape and want > > to be included in 1.36.0, please mark the fixVersion to 1.36.0, this > > will inform the release manager, and we'll try our best to get it in. > > > > CALCITE-5990[5] is marked as a blocker since it's introduced by > > CALCITE-5843[6], could @Mihai help to double check whether it is a > > expected change, and we need to fix it within 1.36.0? > > > > [1] https://calcite.apache.org/docs/history.html#v1-35-0 > > [2] > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950 > > [3] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pulls > > [4] https://lists.apache.org/thread/tm3t42qvpq3db24xtd2g468ofv83l6hk > > [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990 > > [6] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5843 > > > > -- > > > > Best, > > Benchao Li > > >
