Due to the inactivity of the review for CALCITE-5884 and CALCITE-4455,
I think we can move it out of 1.36.0 for now. What do you think?
Other three issues look promising to be merged soon, then I'll start
the release process after they are merged.
Julian Hyde <jhyde.apa...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月31日周二 02:31写道：
>
> I just merged CALCITE-{129,6052}. Five left.
>
> > On Oct 30, 2023, at 7:22 AM, Ran Tao <chucheng...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > The expected release time at the end of the month seems to be coming soon.
> > I performed an update on the list compiled by Jiajun.
> >
> > #1.Last update (new comments or commits) within 2 days (almost ready):
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
> >
> > #2. Last update exceeded 2 days
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
> >
> > #3. Last update exceeded 7 days
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Ran Tao
> >
> >
> > Jiajun Xie <jiajunbernou...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月28日周六 13:34写道：
> >
> >> Hi, all:
> >> We're already very close to 1.36.0, all unresolved issues has been someone
> >> reviewed.
> >>>
> >>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6047?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.36.0
> >>
> >>
> >> - Some issues are currently being reviewed.
> >> That's great! Thank you all for your efforts.
> >> - Some issues have not been updated for a long time.
> >> If anyone is willing to continue the review, I believe they should be
> >> resolved soon.
> >>
> >>
> >> #1.Last update (new comments or commits) within 2 days:
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
> >>
> >> #2. Last update exceeded 2 days
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
> >>
> >> #3. Last update exceeded 7 days
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6037
> >>
> >> #4. Last update exceeded 14 days
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
> >>
> >> On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 at 11:40, Benchao Li <libenc...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Thanks Mihai for the quick response, I'll take a look at the PR.
> >>>
> >>> Mihai Budiu <mbu...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月25日周三 05:02写道：
> >>>>
> >>>> For the blocker issues, I have filed two PRs which should collectively
> >>> fix them.
> >>>>
> >>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3481 fixes
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990, but does not include
> >>> tests, because the test fixture needs to be fixed as well for the tests
> >> to
> >>> pass. There are tests in the next PR:
> >>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3471 fixes
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5921, but should be
> >> amended
> >>> to reenable the disabled tests if we merge 3481 first.
> >>>>
> >>>> Mihai
> >>>>
> >>>> ________________________________
> >>>> From: Benchao Li <libenc...@apache.org>
> >>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2023 5:46 AM
> >>>> To: dev@calcite.apache.org <dev@calcite.apache.org>
> >>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
> >>>>
> >>>> A quick update on the current status for issues targeted 1.36.0
> >>>>
> >>>> We need more reviewers for #2 and #3 since the end of October is
> >>> approaching.
> >>>> Please correct me if I'm mistaken, especially for issues in #1.
> >>>>
> >>>> #1. Issues already have reviewers, and seems promising to be merged
> >>> shortly
> >>>>
> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5918
> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5860
> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6011
> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5949
> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6041
> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6038
> >>>>
> >>>> #2. Issues has been reviewed, and needs another reviewer
> >>>>
> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5825
> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6037
> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6042
> >>>>
> >>>> #3. PR is ready, no reviewer yet
> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
> >>>>
> >>>> #4. blocker issues status
> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990 is marked blocked
> >>>> by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5921 now.
> >>>> Both issues have a PR, but proposed to have a more thorough solution.
> >>>> I'll keep an eye on them closely.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Ran Tao <chucheng...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月18日周三 18:37写道：
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hi, community.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Recently I reported an issue[1] which revealed that calcite's MAP
> >>> SubQuery
> >>>>> doesn't work,
> >>>>> considering this is a feature regression or bug, maybe we can fix it
> >> in
> >>>>> 1.36.
> >>>>> The PR is ready. If someone has time, pls help to review it. many
> >>> thanks.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6041
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Best Regards,
> >>>>> Ran Tao
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Benchao Li <libenc...@apache.org> 于2023年10月8日周日 11:02写道：
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> It's been a bit more than 2 months since our last release [1] and
> >>>>>> there are currently 90+ new commits in main branch.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> As usual, according to our Jira dashboard [2] and Github [3], there
> >>>>>> are many pending issues that could / should be part of the release.
> >>>>>> I'd propose to make a collective effort to try to clean up our 1.36
> >>>>>> backlog and merge the PRs which are in a good state. I'd propose to
> >>>>>> aim for **end of October** to release 1.36.0, this will give us
> >> about
> >>>>>> 20 days to clean up pending PRs for next version. What do you
> >> think?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> According to [4], the following release managers would be:
> >>>>>> - 1.36.0 Benchao Li
> >>>>>> - 1.37.0 Sergey Nuyanzin
> >>>>>> - 1.38.0 Julian Hyde
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> So I'm supposed to be the release manager for 1.36.0
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> And contributors, if you have any work that is in good shape and
> >> want
> >>>>>> to be included in 1.36.0, please mark the fixVersion to 1.36.0,
> >> this
> >>>>>> will inform the release manager, and we'll try our best to get it
> >> in.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> CALCITE-5990[5] is marked as a blocker since it's introduced by
> >>>>>> CALCITE-5843[6], could @Mihai help to double check whether it is a
> >>>>>> expected change, and we need to fix it within 1.36.0?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> [1] https://calcite.apache.org/docs/history.html#v1-35-0
> >>>>>> [2]
> >>>>>>
> >>>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
> >>>>>> [3] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pulls
> >>>>>> [4]
> >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/tm3t42qvpq3db24xtd2g468ofv83l6hk
> >>>>>> [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
> >>>>>> [6] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5843
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>> Benchao Li
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>>
> >>>> Best,
> >>>> Benchao Li
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>>
> >>> Best,
> >>> Benchao Li
> >>>
> >>
>
--
Best,
Benchao Li
