The commit reverting 3154708 is here:
https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/213c13776651f83f95dceb9645a15e940ec6dce1

Let me know if I can do anything else to help and thank y'all for handling
the release!

Best,
Tanner

On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:34 PM Tanner Clary <[email protected]> wrote:

> I can revert it if that's alright, hope this helps!
>
> Best,
> Tanner
>
> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:01 PM Francis Chuang <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> I believe the main branch should still be frozen as we're still voting
>> for 1.36.0.
>>
>> I think 14ed78f22eb854fe4643c6e1faad5b0824733515 needs to be reverted
>> and then rebased on to main after 1.36.0 has been released.
>>
>> Francis
>>
>> On 8/11/2023 12:58 pm, Jiajun Xie wrote:
>> > Hi, Benchao
>> >
>> > Is the main branch still frozen?
>> >
>> > I found a new commit[1], but 1.36.0 has not been released.
>> >
>> > [1]
>> >
>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/3157408a127de0d5c1d6b440bd2086f96f4f91ba
>> >
>> > On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 at 14:59, Benchao Li <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> The release note PR is now available for review:
>> >> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3505
>> >>
>> >> Benchao Li <[email protected]> 于2023年11月6日周一 12:46写道:
>> >>>
>> >>> Hi devs,
>> >>>
>> >>> All the issues targeted for 1.36.0 have been resolved, I'll start the
>> >>> release process now. Therefore main branch is in code freeze until
>> >>> further notice.
>> >>>
>> >>> Benchao Li <[email protected]> 于2023年11月3日周五 10:50写道:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> @Mihai @Julian The only left issue is 5884 now, can we merge it and
>> >>>> start the releasing process?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> LakeShen <[email protected]> 于2023年11月1日周三 12:13写道:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Hi Itiel,
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I have reviewd the https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3325,and
>> >> left one
>> >>>>> comments
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Benchao Li <[email protected]> 于2023年11月1日周三 10:17写道:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> Mihai,
>> >>>>>> I've reviewed 5884, it looks good and I think we can have it in
>> >> 1.36.0
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Itiel,
>> >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3325 has been reviewed and
>> >> even
>> >>>>>> with an approval, I'll try to ping in the PR to try to get it
>> >> merged
>> >>>>>> in 1.36.0
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Mihai Budiu <[email protected]> 于2023年11月1日周三 02:42写道:
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> 5884 is mostly documentation fixes.
>> >>>>>>> I expected it would be easy to get it in.
>> >>>>>>> But we can leave it for later.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Mihai
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> ________________________________
>> >>>>>>> From: Benchao Li <[email protected]>
>> >>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2023 6:50 AM
>> >>>>>>> To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
>> >>>>>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Due to the inactivity of the review for CALCITE-5884 and
>> >> CALCITE-4455,
>> >>>>>>> I think we can move it out of 1.36.0 for now. What do you think?
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Other three issues look promising to be merged soon, then I'll
>> >> start
>> >>>>>>> the release process after they are merged.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Julian Hyde <[email protected]> 于2023年10月31日周二 02:31写道:
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> I just merged CALCITE-{129,6052}. Five left.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> On Oct 30, 2023, at 7:22 AM, Ran Tao <[email protected]>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> The expected release time at the end of the month seems to
>> >> be coming
>> >>>>>> soon.
>> >>>>>>>>> I performed an update on the list compiled by Jiajun.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> #1.Last update (new comments or commits) within 2 days
>> >> (almost
>> >>>>>> ready):
>> >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
>> >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> #2. Last update exceeded 2 days
>> >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
>> >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
>> >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> #3. Last update exceeded 7 days
>> >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
>> >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>> >>>>>>>>> Ran Tao
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Jiajun Xie <[email protected]> 于2023年10月28日周六
>> >> 13:34写道:
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi, all:
>> >>>>>>>>>> We're already very close to 1.36.0, all unresolved issues
>> >> has been
>> >>>>>> someone
>> >>>>>>>>>> reviewed.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6047?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.36.0
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> - Some issues are currently being reviewed.
>> >>>>>>>>>> That's great! Thank you all for your efforts.
>> >>>>>>>>>> - Some issues have not been updated for a long time.
>> >>>>>>>>>> If anyone is willing to continue the review, I believe they
>> >> should
>> >>>>>> be
>> >>>>>>>>>> resolved soon.
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> #1.Last update (new comments or commits) within 2 days:
>> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
>> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> #2. Last update exceeded 2 days
>> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
>> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> #3. Last update exceeded 7 days
>> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
>> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6037
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> #4. Last update exceeded 14 days
>> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
>> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 at 11:40, Benchao Li <
>> >> [email protected]>
>> >>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Mihai for the quick response, I'll take a look at
>> >> the PR.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Mihai Budiu <[email protected]> 于2023年10月25日周三 05:02写道:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> For the blocker issues, I have filed two PRs which should
>> >>>>>> collectively
>> >>>>>>>>>>> fix them.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3481 fixes
>> >>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990, but
>> >> does not
>> >>>>>> include
>> >>>>>>>>>>> tests, because the test fixture needs to be fixed as well
>> >> for the
>> >>>>>> tests
>> >>>>>>>>>> to
>> >>>>>>>>>>> pass. There are tests in the next PR:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3471 fixes
>> >>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5921, but
>> >> should be
>> >>>>>>>>>> amended
>> >>>>>>>>>>> to reenable the disabled tests if we merge 3481 first.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> From: Benchao Li <[email protected]>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2023 5:46 AM
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> A quick update on the current status for issues targeted
>> >> 1.36.0
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> We need more reviewers for #2 and #3 since the end of
>> >> October is
>> >>>>>>>>>>> approaching.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Please correct me if I'm mistaken, especially for issues
>> >> in #1.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> #1. Issues already have reviewers, and seems promising to
>> >> be
>> >>>>>> merged
>> >>>>>>>>>>> shortly
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5918
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5860
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6011
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5949
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6041
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6038
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> #2. Issues has been reviewed, and needs another reviewer
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5825
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6037
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6042
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> #3. PR is ready, no reviewer yet
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> #4. blocker issues status
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990 is
>> >> marked
>> >>>>>> blocked
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5921
>> >> now.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Both issues have a PR, but proposed to have a more
>> >> thorough
>> >>>>>> solution.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I'll keep an eye on them closely.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Ran Tao <[email protected]> 于2023年10月18日周三 18:37写道:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, community.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Recently I reported an issue[1] which revealed that
>> >> calcite's MAP
>> >>>>>>>>>>> SubQuery
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't work,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> considering this is a feature regression or bug, maybe
>> >> we can
>> >>>>>> fix it
>> >>>>>>>>>> in
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.36.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The PR is ready. If someone has time, pls help to review
>> >> it. many
>> >>>>>>>>>>> thanks.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6041
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ran Tao
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li <[email protected]> 于2023年10月8日周日 11:02写道:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's been a bit more than 2 months since our last
>> >> release [1]
>> >>>>>> and
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> there are currently 90+ new commits in main branch.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> As usual, according to our Jira dashboard [2] and
>> >> Github [3],
>> >>>>>> there
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> are many pending issues that could / should be part of
>> >> the
>> >>>>>> release.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd propose to make a collective effort to try to clean
>> >> up our
>> >>>>>> 1.36
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> backlog and merge the PRs which are in a good state. I'd
>> >>>>>> propose to
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> aim for **end of October** to release 1.36.0, this will
>> >> give us
>> >>>>>>>>>> about
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 20 days to clean up pending PRs for next version. What
>> >> do you
>> >>>>>>>>>> think?
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> According to [4], the following release managers would
>> >> be:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 1.36.0 Benchao Li
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 1.37.0 Sergey Nuyanzin
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 1.38.0 Julian Hyde
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So I'm supposed to be the release manager for 1.36.0
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> And contributors, if you have any work that is in good
>> >> shape and
>> >>>>>>>>>> want
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be included in 1.36.0, please mark the fixVersion to
>> >> 1.36.0,
>> >>>>>>>>>> this
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> will inform the release manager, and we'll try our best
>> >> to get
>> >>>>>> it
>> >>>>>>>>>> in.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-5990[5] is marked as a blocker since it's
>> >> introduced by
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-5843[6], could @Mihai help to double check
>> >> whether it
>> >>>>>> is a
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> expected change, and we need to fix it within 1.36.0?
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>> >> https://calcite.apache.org/docs/history.html#v1-35-0
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pulls
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4]
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/tm3t42qvpq3db24xtd2g468ofv83l6hk
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [6] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5843
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> --
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> --
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> --
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Best,
>> >>>>>>> Benchao Li
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> --
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Best,
>> >>>>>> Benchao Li
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> --
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Best,
>> >>>> Benchao Li
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>>
>> >>> Best,
>> >>> Benchao Li
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >>
>> >> Best,
>> >> Benchao Li
>> >>
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to