Sounds good, I'll keep track of that and make sure it gets rebased. On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 7:01 PM Francis Chuang <francischu...@apache.org> wrote:
> Looks great, Tanner! > > As the original PR has been merged and cannot be reopened, let's > remember to rebase the commit onto main after 1.36.0 has been released. > > On 8/11/2023 1:58 pm, Tanner Clary wrote: > > Ok I believe I reset main to > > > https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/4c9011c388f826c36463ae7da875ddb525104376 > > . > > Feel free to take a look at > https://github.com/apache/calcite/commits/main > > and let me know if I've made any mistakes. Sorry for any confusion and > > thanks for your patience. > > > > Best, > > Tanner > > > > On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:54 PM Tanner Clary <tannercl...@google.com> > wrote: > > > >> Oops I took revert too literally. I can reset it two commits (the revert > >> commit and the commit I reverted). Sorry for the misunderstanding. > >> > >> Tanner > >> > >> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:49 PM Benchao Li <libenc...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > >>> Tanner, > >>> > >>> By saying "revert", I think we actually mean "reset to earlier > >>> commit( > >>> > https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/4c9011c388f826c36463ae7da875ddb525104376 > >>> ), > >>> and force push main branch". Because the commit we are voting on is > >>> > >>> > https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/0be8eaebcf27afae9ecda8ab79db63c214426561 > >>> , > >>> after the voting, I'll push it to main with additional commits > >>> preparing for next version, then all the commits after > >>> > >>> > https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/4c9011c388f826c36463ae7da875ddb525104376 > >>> will be invalid. > >>> > >>> Tanner Clary <tannercl...@google.com.invalid> 于2023年11月8日周三 10:43写道： > >>>> > >>>> The commit reverting 3154708 is here: > >>>> > >>> > https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/213c13776651f83f95dceb9645a15e940ec6dce1 > >>>> > >>>> Let me know if I can do anything else to help and thank y'all for > >>> handling > >>>> the release! > >>>> > >>>> Best, > >>>> Tanner > >>>> > >>>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:34 PM Tanner Clary <tannercl...@google.com> > >>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> I can revert it if that's alright, hope this helps! > >>>>> > >>>>> Best, > >>>>> Tanner > >>>>> > >>>>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:01 PM Francis Chuang < > >>> francischu...@apache.org> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> I believe the main branch should still be frozen as we're still > >>> voting > >>>>>> for 1.36.0. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I think 14ed78f22eb854fe4643c6e1faad5b0824733515 needs to be > reverted > >>>>>> and then rebased on to main after 1.36.0 has been released. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Francis > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On 8/11/2023 12:58 pm, Jiajun Xie wrote: > >>>>>>> Hi, Benchao > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Is the main branch still frozen? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I found a new commit[1], but 1.36.0 has not been released. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> [1] > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>> > https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/3157408a127de0d5c1d6b440bd2086f96f4f91ba > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 at 14:59, Benchao Li <libenc...@apache.org> > >>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> The release note PR is now available for review: > >>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3505 > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Benchao Li <libenc...@apache.org> 于2023年11月6日周一 12:46写道： > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Hi devs, > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> All the issues targeted for 1.36.0 have been resolved, I'll > >>> start the > >>>>>>>>> release process now. Therefore main branch is in code freeze > >>> until > >>>>>>>>> further notice. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Benchao Li <libenc...@apache.org> 于2023年11月3日周五 10:50写道： > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> @Mihai @Julian The only left issue is 5884 now, can we merge it > >>> and > >>>>>>>>>> start the releasing process? > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> LakeShen <shenleifight...@gmail.com> 于2023年11月1日周三 12:13写道： > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Itiel, > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> I have reviewd the > >>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3325,and > >>>>>>>> left one > >>>>>>>>>>> comments > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li <libenc...@apache.org> 于2023年11月1日周三 10:17写道： > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai, > >>>>>>>>>>>> I've reviewed 5884, it looks good and I think we can have it > >>> in > >>>>>>>> 1.36.0 > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Itiel, > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3325 has been > >>> reviewed and > >>>>>>>> even > >>>>>>>>>>>> with an approval, I'll try to ping in the PR to try to get it > >>>>>>>> merged > >>>>>>>>>>>> in 1.36.0 > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai Budiu <mbu...@gmail.com> 于2023年11月1日周三 02:42写道： > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 5884 is mostly documentation fixes. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I expected it would be easy to get it in. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> But we can leave it for later. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________ > >>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Benchao Li <libenc...@apache.org> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2023 6:50 AM > >>>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev@calcite.apache.org <dev@calcite.apache.org> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0 > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Due to the inactivity of the review for CALCITE-5884 and > >>>>>>>> CALCITE-4455, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we can move it out of 1.36.0 for now. What do you > >>> think? > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Other three issues look promising to be merged soon, then > >>> I'll > >>>>>>>> start > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the release process after they are merged. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Julian Hyde <jhyde.apa...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月31日周二 02:31写道： > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just merged CALCITE-{129,6052}. Five left. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 30, 2023, at 7:22 AM, Ran Tao < > >>> chucheng...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The expected release time at the end of the month seems to > >>>>>>>> be coming > >>>>>>>>>>>> soon. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I performed an update on the list compiled by Jiajun. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #1.Last update (new comments or commits) within 2 days > >>>>>>>> (almost > >>>>>>>>>>>> ready): > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #2. Last update exceeded 2 days > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #3. Last update exceeded 7 days > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ran Tao > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jiajun Xie <jiajunbernou...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月28日周六 > >>>>>>>> 13:34写道： > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, all: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We're already very close to 1.36.0, all unresolved issues > >>>>>>>> has been > >>>>>>>>>>>> someone > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reviewed. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6047?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.36.0 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Some issues are currently being reviewed. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's great! Thank you all for your efforts. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Some issues have not been updated for a long time. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If anyone is willing to continue the review, I believe > >>> they > >>>>>>>> should > >>>>>>>>>>>> be > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resolved soon. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #1.Last update (new comments or commits) within 2 days: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #2. Last update exceeded 2 days > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #3. Last update exceeded 7 days > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6037 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #4. Last update exceeded 14 days > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 at 11:40, Benchao Li < > >>>>>>>> libenc...@apache.org> > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Mihai for the quick response, I'll take a look at > >>>>>>>> the PR. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai Budiu <mbu...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月25日周三 05:02写道： > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For the blocker issues, I have filed two PRs which > >>> should > >>>>>>>>>>>> collectively > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fix them. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3481 fixes > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990, but > >>>>>>>> does not > >>>>>>>>>>>> include > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests, because the test fixture needs to be fixed as well > >>>>>>>> for the > >>>>>>>>>>>> tests > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pass. There are tests in the next PR: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3471 fixes > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5921, but > >>>>>>>> should be > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> amended > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to reenable the disabled tests if we merge 3481 first. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________ > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Benchao Li <libenc...@apache.org> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2023 5:46 AM > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev@calcite.apache.org <dev@calcite.apache.org> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A quick update on the current status for issues targeted > >>>>>>>> 1.36.0 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We need more reviewers for #2 and #3 since the end of > >>>>>>>> October is > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> approaching. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please correct me if I'm mistaken, especially for issues > >>>>>>>> in #1. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #1. Issues already have reviewers, and seems promising > >>> to > >>>>>>>> be > >>>>>>>>>>>> merged > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shortly > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5918 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5860 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6011 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5949 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6041 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6038 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #2. Issues has been reviewed, and needs another reviewer > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5825 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6037 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6042 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #3. PR is ready, no reviewer yet > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #4. blocker issues status > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990 is > >>>>>>>> marked > >>>>>>>>>>>> blocked > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5921 > >>>>>>>> now. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Both issues have a PR, but proposed to have a more > >>>>>>>> thorough > >>>>>>>>>>>> solution. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll keep an eye on them closely. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ran Tao <chucheng...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月18日周三 18:37写道： > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, community. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Recently I reported an issue[1] which revealed that > >>>>>>>> calcite's MAP > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SubQuery > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't work, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> considering this is a feature regression or bug, maybe > >>>>>>>> we can > >>>>>>>>>>>> fix it > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.36. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The PR is ready. If someone has time, pls help to > >>> review > >>>>>>>> it. many > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thanks. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6041 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ran Tao > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li <libenc...@apache.org> 于2023年10月8日周日 > >>> 11:02写道： > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's been a bit more than 2 months since our last > >>>>>>>> release [1] > >>>>>>>>>>>> and > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there are currently 90+ new commits in main branch. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As usual, according to our Jira dashboard [2] and > >>>>>>>> Github [3], > >>>>>>>>>>>> there > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are many pending issues that could / should be part of > >>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>> release. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd propose to make a collective effort to try to > >>> clean > >>>>>>>> up our > >>>>>>>>>>>> 1.36 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> backlog and merge the PRs which are in a good state. > >>> I'd > >>>>>>>>>>>> propose to > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aim for **end of October** to release 1.36.0, this > >>> will > >>>>>>>> give us > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 20 days to clean up pending PRs for next version. What > >>>>>>>> do you > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> According to [4], the following release managers would > >>>>>>>> be: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 1.36.0 Benchao Li > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 1.37.0 Sergey Nuyanzin > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 1.38.0 Julian Hyde > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So I'm supposed to be the release manager for 1.36.0 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And contributors, if you have any work that is in good > >>>>>>>> shape and > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> want > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be included in 1.36.0, please mark the fixVersion > >>> to > >>>>>>>> 1.36.0, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will inform the release manager, and we'll try our > >>> best > >>>>>>>> to get > >>>>>>>>>>>> it > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-5990[5] is marked as a blocker since it's > >>>>>>>> introduced by > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-5843[6], could @Mihai help to double check > >>>>>>>> whether it > >>>>>>>>>>>> is a > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expected change, and we need to fix it within 1.36.0? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > >>>>>>>> https://calcite.apache.org/docs/history.html#v1-35-0 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pulls > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4] > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/tm3t42qvpq3db24xtd2g468ofv83l6hk > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [5] > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [6] > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5843 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > >>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Best, > >>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Best, > >>>>>>>>> Benchao Li > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Best, > >>>>>>>> Benchao Li > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> > >>> Best, > >>> Benchao Li > >>> > >> > > >
