Thanks Francis, I'll proceed with next steps now. Francis Chuang <francischu...@apache.org> 于2023年11月10日周五 19:01写道： > > I think something has changed in the openjdk image used to build the > javadocs. > > See: > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/73516116/got-error-xargs-is-not-available-when-trying-to-run-a-docker-image/75660631#75660631 > > I think we need to move to the eclipse-temurin images as the openjdk > images have been EOL for a while. > > I think just leave the javadoc publishing for now, as I'll open a PR > after the release to fix this. > > Francis > > On 10/11/2023 9:50 pm, Benchao Li wrote: > > Thanks Francis for your response. > > > > There is one more problem, that the CI for releasing javadoc[1] is > > failing with "xargs is not available". > > > > [1] > > https://github.com/apache/calcite/actions/runs/6822762022/job/18555648165 > > > > Francis Chuang <francischu...@apache.org> 于2023年11月10日周五 18:18写道： > >> > >> I do see 1.36.0 on ASF Nexus (https://repository.apache.org/) I wonder > >> if it's just replication lag. > >> > >> On 10/11/2023 9:07 pm, Benchao Li wrote: > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> I met some problems while publishing. > >>> > >>> The command I'm using is `./gradlew publishDist -Prc=0 -Pasf > >>> -Pasf.git.pushRepositoryProvider=GITHUB`. Although the command ran > >>> successfully, I noticed the 'releaseRepository' prints somethings > >>> wield, and actually there is no 1.36.0 in nexus yet[1]. , Below is all > >>> the output from it: > >>> > >>> Starting a Gradle Daemon (subsequent builds will be faster) > >>> > >>>> Configure project : > >>> Building Apache Calcite 1.36.0 > >>> > >>>> Task :publishSvnDist > >>> Listing SVN folders [dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0-rc0] at > >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist > >>> Executing svnmucc. root=https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist, > >>> message=Promoting Apache Calcite calcite-1.36.0-rc0 -> calcite-1.36.0 > >>> to release area, commands: > >>> mkdir > >>> release/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0 > >>> cp > >>> 65079 > >>> dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0-rc0/apache-calcite-1.36.0-src.tar.gz > >>> release/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0/apache-calcite-1.36.0-src.tar.gz > >>> cp > >>> 65079 > >>> dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0-rc0/apache-calcite-1.36.0-src.tar.gz.asc > >>> release/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0/apache-calcite-1.36.0-src.tar.gz.asc > >>> cp > >>> 65079 > >>> dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0-rc0/apache-calcite-1.36.0-src.tar.gz.sha512 > >>> release/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0/apache-calcite-1.36.0-src.tar.gz.sha512 > >>> rm > >>> dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0-rc0 > >>> r65191 committed by libenchao at 2023-11-10T08:56:00.445211Z > >>> > >>>> Task :releaseRepository > >>> Initialized stagingRepositoryId orgapachecalcite-1219 for repository nexus > >>> GET request failed. 404: Not Found, body: [errors:[[id:*, msg:No such > >>> repository: orgapachecalcite-1219]]] > >>> Requested operation was executed successfully in attempt 83 (maximum > >>> allowed 601) > >>> > >>>> Task :createReleaseTag > >>> Created tag calcite-1.36.0 -> > >>> Ref[refs/tags/calcite-1.36.0=450f51a96db8253e0ae62661e3be46a707a2cd8c(-1)] > >>> > >>>> Task :pushReleaseTag > >>> Pushing tag to Git remote release-origin: > >>> https://github.com/apache/calcite.git > >>> Message from release-origin: > >>> refs/tags/calcite-1.36.0: OK, > >>> 450f51a96db8253e0ae62661e3be46a707a2cd8c (fastForward) > >>> > >>> Deprecated Gradle features were used in this build, making it > >>> incompatible with Gradle 8.0. > >>> > >>> You can use '--warning-mode all' to show the individual deprecation > >>> warnings and determine if they come from your own scripts or plugins. > >>> > >>> See > >>> https://docs.gradle.org/7.6.1/userguide/command_line_interface.html#sec:command_line_warnings > >>> > >>> BUILD SUCCESSFUL in 5m 4s > >>> 34 actionable tasks: 4 executed, 30 up-to-date > >>> > >>> > >>> [1] https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.calcite/calcite-core > >>> > >>> Tanner Clary <tannercl...@google.com.invalid> 于2023年11月8日周三 11:18写道： > >>>> > >>>> Sounds good, I'll keep track of that and make sure it gets rebased. > >>>> > >>>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 7:01 PM Francis Chuang <francischu...@apache.org> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Looks great, Tanner! > >>>>> > >>>>> As the original PR has been merged and cannot be reopened, let's > >>>>> remember to rebase the commit onto main after 1.36.0 has been released. > >>>>> > >>>>> On 8/11/2023 1:58 pm, Tanner Clary wrote: > >>>>>> Ok I believe I reset main to > >>>>>> > >>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/4c9011c388f826c36463ae7da875ddb525104376 > >>>>>> . > >>>>>> Feel free to take a look at > >>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commits/main > >>>>>> and let me know if I've made any mistakes. Sorry for any confusion and > >>>>>> thanks for your patience. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Best, > >>>>>> Tanner > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:54 PM Tanner Clary <tannercl...@google.com> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Oops I took revert too literally. I can reset it two commits (the > >>>>>>> revert > >>>>>>> commit and the commit I reverted). Sorry for the misunderstanding. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Tanner > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:49 PM Benchao Li <libenc...@apache.org> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Tanner, > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> By saying "revert", I think we actually mean "reset to earlier > >>>>>>>> commit( > >>>>>>>> > >>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/4c9011c388f826c36463ae7da875ddb525104376 > >>>>>>>> ), > >>>>>>>> and force push main branch". Because the commit we are voting on is > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/0be8eaebcf27afae9ecda8ab79db63c214426561 > >>>>>>>> , > >>>>>>>> after the voting, I'll push it to main with additional commits > >>>>>>>> preparing for next version, then all the commits after > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/4c9011c388f826c36463ae7da875ddb525104376 > >>>>>>>> will be invalid. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Tanner Clary <tannercl...@google.com.invalid> 于2023年11月8日周三 10:43写道： > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> The commit reverting 3154708 is here: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/213c13776651f83f95dceb9645a15e940ec6dce1 > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Let me know if I can do anything else to help and thank y'all for > >>>>>>>> handling > >>>>>>>>> the release! > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Best, > >>>>>>>>> Tanner > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:34 PM Tanner Clary <tannercl...@google.com> > >>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> I can revert it if that's alright, hope this helps! > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Best, > >>>>>>>>>> Tanner > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:01 PM Francis Chuang < > >>>>>>>> francischu...@apache.org> > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> I believe the main branch should still be frozen as we're still > >>>>>>>> voting > >>>>>>>>>>> for 1.36.0. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> I think 14ed78f22eb854fe4643c6e1faad5b0824733515 needs to be > >>>>> reverted > >>>>>>>>>>> and then rebased on to main after 1.36.0 has been released. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Francis > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On 8/11/2023 12:58 pm, Jiajun Xie wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, Benchao > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Is the main branch still frozen? > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> I found a new commit[1], but 1.36.0 has not been released. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/3157408a127de0d5c1d6b440bd2086f96f4f91ba > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 at 14:59, Benchao Li <libenc...@apache.org> > >>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> The release note PR is now available for review: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3505 > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li <libenc...@apache.org> 于2023年11月6日周一 12:46写道： > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi devs, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> All the issues targeted for 1.36.0 have been resolved, I'll > >>>>>>>> start the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> release process now. Therefore main branch is in code freeze > >>>>>>>> until > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> further notice. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li <libenc...@apache.org> 于2023年11月3日周五 10:50写道： > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Mihai @Julian The only left issue is 5884 now, can we merge > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it > >>>>>>>> and > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> start the releasing process? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LakeShen <shenleifight...@gmail.com> 于2023年11月1日周三 12:13写道： > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Itiel, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have reviewd the > >>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3325,and > >>>>>>>>>>>>> left one > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comments > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li <libenc...@apache.org> 于2023年11月1日周三 10:17写道： > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've reviewed 5884, it looks good and I think we can have it > >>>>>>>> in > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.36.0 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Itiel, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3325 has been > >>>>>>>> reviewed and > >>>>>>>>>>>>> even > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with an approval, I'll try to ping in the PR to try to get > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it > >>>>>>>>>>>>> merged > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in 1.36.0 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai Budiu <mbu...@gmail.com> 于2023年11月1日周三 02:42写道： > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5884 is mostly documentation fixes. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I expected it would be easy to get it in. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But we can leave it for later. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________ > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Benchao Li <libenc...@apache.org> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2023 6:50 AM > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev@calcite.apache.org <dev@calcite.apache.org> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Due to the inactivity of the review for CALCITE-5884 and > >>>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-4455, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we can move it out of 1.36.0 for now. What do you > >>>>>>>> think? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Other three issues look promising to be merged soon, then > >>>>>>>> I'll > >>>>>>>>>>>>> start > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the release process after they are merged. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Julian Hyde <jhyde.apa...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月31日周二 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 02:31写道： > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just merged CALCITE-{129,6052}. Five left. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 30, 2023, at 7:22 AM, Ran Tao < > >>>>>>>> chucheng...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The expected release time at the end of the month seems > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>>>> be coming > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> soon. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I performed an update on the list compiled by Jiajun. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #1.Last update (new comments or commits) within 2 days > >>>>>>>>>>>>> (almost > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ready): > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #2. Last update exceeded 2 days > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #3. Last update exceeded 7 days > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ran Tao > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jiajun Xie <jiajunbernou...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月28日周六 > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 13:34写道： > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, all: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We're already very close to 1.36.0, all unresolved > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues > >>>>>>>>>>>>> has been > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> someone > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reviewed. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6047?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.36.0 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Some issues are currently being reviewed. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's great! Thank you all for your efforts. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Some issues have not been updated for a long time. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If anyone is willing to continue the review, I believe > >>>>>>>> they > >>>>>>>>>>>>> should > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resolved soon. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #1.Last update (new comments or commits) within 2 days: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #2. Last update exceeded 2 days > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #3. Last update exceeded 7 days > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6037 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #4. Last update exceeded 14 days > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 at 11:40, Benchao Li < > >>>>>>>>>>>>> libenc...@apache.org> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Mihai for the quick response, I'll take a look > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the PR. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai Budiu <mbu...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月25日周三 05:02写道： > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For the blocker issues, I have filed two PRs which > >>>>>>>> should > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collectively > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fix them. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3481 fixes > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990, but > >>>>>>>>>>>>> does not > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> include > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests, because the test fixture needs to be fixed as > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> well > >>>>>>>>>>>>> for the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pass. There are tests in the next PR: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3471 fixes > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5921, but > >>>>>>>>>>>>> should be > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> amended > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to reenable the disabled tests if we merge 3481 first. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________ > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Benchao Li <libenc...@apache.org> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2023 5:46 AM > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev@calcite.apache.org <dev@calcite.apache.org> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A quick update on the current status for issues > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> targeted > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.36.0 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We need more reviewers for #2 and #3 since the end of > >>>>>>>>>>>>> October is > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> approaching. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please correct me if I'm mistaken, especially for > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues > >>>>>>>>>>>>> in #1. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #1. Issues already have reviewers, and seems promising > >>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>>>> be > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> merged > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shortly > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5918 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5860 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6011 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5949 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6041 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6038 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #2. Issues has been reviewed, and needs another > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reviewer > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5825 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6037 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6042 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #3. PR is ready, no reviewer yet > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #4. blocker issues status > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990 is > >>>>>>>>>>>>> marked > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blocked > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5921 > >>>>>>>>>>>>> now. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Both issues have a PR, but proposed to have a more > >>>>>>>>>>>>> thorough > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> solution. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll keep an eye on them closely. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ran Tao <chucheng...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月18日周三 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 18:37写道： > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, community. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Recently I reported an issue[1] which revealed that > >>>>>>>>>>>>> calcite's MAP > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SubQuery > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't work, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> considering this is a feature regression or bug, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> maybe > >>>>>>>>>>>>> we can > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fix it > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.36. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The PR is ready. If someone has time, pls help to > >>>>>>>> review > >>>>>>>>>>>>> it. many > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thanks. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6041 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ran Tao > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li <libenc...@apache.org> 于2023年10月8日周日 > >>>>>>>> 11:02写道： > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's been a bit more than 2 months since our last > >>>>>>>>>>>>> release [1] > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there are currently 90+ new commits in main branch. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As usual, according to our Jira dashboard [2] and > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Github [3], > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are many pending issues that could / should be part > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd propose to make a collective effort to try to > >>>>>>>> clean > >>>>>>>>>>>>> up our > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.36 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> backlog and merge the PRs which are in a good state. > >>>>>>>> I'd > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> propose to > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aim for **end of October** to release 1.36.0, this > >>>>>>>> will > >>>>>>>>>>>>> give us > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 20 days to clean up pending PRs for next version. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What > >>>>>>>>>>>>> do you > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> According to [4], the following release managers > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would > >>>>>>>>>>>>> be: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 1.36.0 Benchao Li > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 1.37.0 Sergey Nuyanzin > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 1.38.0 Julian Hyde > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So I'm supposed to be the release manager for 1.36.0 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And contributors, if you have any work that is in > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> good > >>>>>>>>>>>>> shape and > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> want > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be included in 1.36.0, please mark the fixVersion > >>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.36.0, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will inform the release manager, and we'll try our > >>>>>>>> best > >>>>>>>>>>>>> to get > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-5990[5] is marked as a blocker since it's > >>>>>>>>>>>>> introduced by > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-5843[6], could @Mihai help to double check > >>>>>>>>>>>>> whether it > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is a > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expected change, and we need to fix it within > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.36.0? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://calcite.apache.org/docs/history.html#v1-35-0 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pulls > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4] > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/tm3t42qvpq3db24xtd2g468ofv83l6hk > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [5] > >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [6] > >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5843 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Best, > >>>>>>>> Benchao Li > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > > > > > >
-- Best, Benchao Li
