Thanks Francis. I think it can be a good idea to have Avatica 1.27.0, then upgrade Calcite to said version (which would allow us to complete CALCITE-5094), and then proceed with Calcite 1.41.0. This overall process might delay a bit the original proposed schedule, but I'd say it's ok (there's no rush, and it's been a while since our last Avatica release, so it's a good thing if we could have a new one).
Ruben On Mon, Sep 8, 2025 at 10:53 PM Francis Chuang <[email protected]> wrote: > If a release of Avatica is required before Calcite 1.41.0, I am happy to > be RM for Avatica 1.27.0. > > Francis > > On 9/09/2025 6:44 am, Bertil Chapuis wrote: > > Hello Ruben, > > > > I’d like to add CALCITE-6239 and CALCITE-6263 addressed in [1] to the > list. The PR improves support for PostGIS. I think it is in relatively good > shape, but I’m still waiting for a feedback regarding the coupling to Java > Topology Suite [2] before merging. > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3668 > > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/y4hhfmydp5mn1slt9b5hf88htg86zdyj > > > > Best regards, > > > > Bertil > > > > > > > >> On 8 Sep 2025, at 22:13, Alessandro Solimando < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Hi Ruben, > >> thanks for volunteering to be the RM for 1.41.0! > >> > >> I am adding CALCITE-7163 > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-7163> [1] to the list, > which > >> just upgrades Sonar plugin for Gradle, hoping that the many improvements > >> will alleviate the Sonar failures we have seen in CI for quite some time > >> now. > >> > >> Best regards, > >> Alessandro > >> > >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-7163 > >> > >> On Mon, 8 Sept 2025 at 19:01, Mihai Budiu <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> 7070 is on me, and I have precise comments from Julian, just have to > find > >>> the tine to work on it. > >>> > >>> Mihai > >>> > >>> > >>> ________________________________ > >>> From: 我 <[email protected]> > >>> Sent: Monday, September 8, 2025 6:54 AM > >>> To: dev <[email protected]> > >>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.41.0 > >>> > >>> Hi Ruben, > >>> Thank you very much for taking the time to serve as the RM for version > >>> 1.41.0! I’d like to share some information I’ve gathered for your > >>> reference. I feel that CALCITE-7122 and CALCITE-7160 should be > relatively > >>> easy to resolve within a few days. CALCITE-7070 might be more tricky, > as it > >>> seems no consensus has been reached yet. CALCITE-5094 appears mostly > ready > >>> but depends on Avatica. Since the prerequisite PR has already been > merged > >>> into Avatica, it looks like we just need to wait for a new release of > >>> Avatica to complete this task. > >>> > >>> > >>> Best, > >>> Zhen Chen > >>> > >>> > >>> ---- Replied Message ---- > >>> | From | Ruben Q L<[email protected]> | > >>> | Date | 09/08/2025 20:55 | > >>> | To | [email protected] | > >>> | Cc | | > >>> | Subject | Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.41.0 | > >>> Thanks Stamatis for refloating this and for volunteering for 1.43; I > can > >>> take care of 1.41: > >>> 1.41.0: Ruben QL > >>> 1.42.0: ? > >>> 1.43.0: Stamatis Zampetakis > >>> 1.44.0: ? > >>> It would be nice to have some more volunteers to fill the remaining > spots. > >>> > >>> Regarding 1.41 schedule: looking at the dashboard [1] it seems there's > only > >>> 4 pending tickets, all of them with PR available, so hopefully we could > >>> finalize the scope rather soon. > >>> Are there any other tickets that should be part of 1.41? > >>> > >>> I'd propose to try to finalize pending tickets in the next couple of > weeks, > >>> and prepare the first RC around 20th of September, to try to get the > new > >>> release by the end of the month; how does it sound? > >>> > >>> Best regards, > >>> Ruben > >>> > >>> [1] > >>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950 > >>> > >>> > >>> On Wed, Sep 3, 2025 at 9:28 AM Stamatis Zampetakis <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> It is indeed a good time to start pushing for the 1.41.0 release. > >>>> > >>>> It appears that we don't have a RM yet but we can still continue the > >>>> discussion about the tickets that we would like to go in. Is there > >>>> anything in particular that we would like to merge before cutting the > >>>> first release candidate? > >>>> > >>>> In the meantime if someone wants to serve as RM please speak up. It's > >>>> the first time after a while that we don't have anyone in the list of > >>>> volunteers so let's try to fix this. > >>>> 1.41.0: ? > >>>> 1.42.0: ? > >>>> 1.43.0: Stamatis Zampetakis > >>>> 1.44.0: ? > >>>> > >>>> Best, > >>>> Stamatis > >>>> > >>>> On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 6:14 PM Ruben Q L <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Hello, > >>>>> > >>>>> It's been approximately 3 months since our last release [1]; if we > want > >>>> to > >>>>> keep our release rhythm, I think we should start the discussions to > >>>> produce > >>>>> a 1.41 in the next month or so. > >>>>> > >>>>> If I am not mistaken, our next release managers would be [2]: > >>>>> - Hongyu Guo > >>>>> - Jing Zhang > >>>>> @Hongyu, Jing: Are you still available to serve as RM in the > short/mid > >>>> term? > >>>>> > >>>>> Are there other volunteers who would like to join the RM list? > >>>>> > >>>>> Best regards, > >>>>> Ruben > >>>>> > >>>>> [1] https://calcite.apache.org/news/2025/05/28/release-1.40.0/ > >>>>> [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/j847g5q8l2fq90xzr93bx69csj0srmsw > >>>> > >>> > > > > > >
