If no one is the release manager for 1.44.0, I can be the release manager for 1.44.0. Although I don't understand the release process very well, I can start learning.
Best wishes， Cancai Cai On 2025/09/11 08:37:29 Ruben Q L wrote: > Thanks, Julian. > > The updated RM list: > 1.41.0: Ruben QL > 1.42.0: Julian Hyde > 1.43.0: Stamatis Zampetakis > 1.44.0: ? > > > > On Tue, Sep 9, 2025 at 6:37 PM Julian Hyde <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Put me down as RM for 1.42, if no one else volunteered. > > > > (Sorry I've not been contributing much to Calcite recently… I’ve had my > > head down working on Morel, first in Java, and in the last month in Rust. > > It has been time well spent. My work has given me some good perspective on > > the relationship between compilers and optimizers, and I’m also getting to > > see the data world from the Rust side of the fence.) > > > > > On Sep 9, 2025, at 2:57 AM, Alessandro Solimando < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > +1 on releasing Avatica first, thanks a lot Francis for being RM one more > > > time > > > > > > Best regards, > > > Alessandro > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 9, 2025, 08:52 Ruben Q L <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> Thanks Francis. I think it can be a good idea to have Avatica 1.27.0, > > then > > >> upgrade Calcite to said version (which would allow us to complete > > >> CALCITE-5094), and then proceed with Calcite 1.41.0. > > >> This overall process might delay a bit the original proposed schedule, > > but > > >> I'd say it's ok (there's no rush, and it's been a while since our last > > >> Avatica release, so it's a good thing if we could have a new one). > > >> > > >> Ruben > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> On Mon, Sep 8, 2025 at 10:53 PM Francis Chuang < > > [email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >>> If a release of Avatica is required before Calcite 1.41.0, I am happy > > to > > >>> be RM for Avatica 1.27.0. > > >>> > > >>> Francis > > >>> > > >>> On 9/09/2025 6:44 am, Bertil Chapuis wrote: > > >>>> Hello Ruben, > > >>>> > > >>>> I’d like to add CALCITE-6239 and CALCITE-6263 addressed in [1] to the > > >>> list. The PR improves support for PostGIS. I think it is in relatively > > >> good > > >>> shape, but I’m still waiting for a feedback regarding the coupling to > > >> Java > > >>> Topology Suite [2] before merging. > > >>>> > > >>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3668 > > >>>> [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/y4hhfmydp5mn1slt9b5hf88htg86zdyj > > >>>> > > >>>> Best regards, > > >>>> > > >>>> Bertil > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>>> On 8 Sep 2025, at 22:13, Alessandro Solimando < > > >>> [email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Hi Ruben, > > >>>>> thanks for volunteering to be the RM for 1.41.0! > > >>>>> > > >>>>> I am adding CALCITE-7163 > > >>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-7163> [1] to the > > list, > > >>> which > > >>>>> just upgrades Sonar plugin for Gradle, hoping that the many > > >> improvements > > >>>>> will alleviate the Sonar failures we have seen in CI for quite some > > >> time > > >>>>> now. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Best regards, > > >>>>> Alessandro > > >>>>> > > >>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-7163 > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Mon, 8 Sept 2025 at 19:01, Mihai Budiu <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> 7070 is on me, and I have precise comments from Julian, just have to > > >>> find > > >>>>>> the tine to work on it. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Mihai > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> ________________________________ > > >>>>>> From: 我 <[email protected]> > > >>>>>> Sent: Monday, September 8, 2025 6:54 AM > > >>>>>> To: dev <[email protected]> > > >>>>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.41.0 > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Hi Ruben, > > >>>>>> Thank you very much for taking the time to serve as the RM for > > >> version > > >>>>>> 1.41.0! I’d like to share some information I’ve gathered for your > > >>>>>> reference. I feel that CALCITE-7122 and CALCITE-7160 should be > > >>> relatively > > >>>>>> easy to resolve within a few days. CALCITE-7070 might be more > > tricky, > > >>> as it > > >>>>>> seems no consensus has been reached yet. CALCITE-5094 appears mostly > > >>> ready > > >>>>>> but depends on Avatica. Since the prerequisite PR has already been > > >>> merged > > >>>>>> into Avatica, it looks like we just need to wait for a new release > > of > > >>>>>> Avatica to complete this task. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Best, > > >>>>>> Zhen Chen > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> ---- Replied Message ---- > > >>>>>> | From | Ruben Q L<[email protected]> | > > >>>>>> | Date | 09/08/2025 20:55 | > > >>>>>> | To | [email protected] | > > >>>>>> | Cc | | > > >>>>>> | Subject | Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.41.0 | > > >>>>>> Thanks Stamatis for refloating this and for volunteering for 1.43; I > > >>> can > > >>>>>> take care of 1.41: > > >>>>>> 1.41.0: Ruben QL > > >>>>>> 1.42.0: ? > > >>>>>> 1.43.0: Stamatis Zampetakis > > >>>>>> 1.44.0: ? > > >>>>>> It would be nice to have some more volunteers to fill the remaining > > >>> spots. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Regarding 1.41 schedule: looking at the dashboard [1] it seems > > >> there's > > >>> only > > >>>>>> 4 pending tickets, all of them with PR available, so hopefully we > > >> could > > >>>>>> finalize the scope rather soon. > > >>>>>> Are there any other tickets that should be part of 1.41? > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> I'd propose to try to finalize pending tickets in the next couple of > > >>> weeks, > > >>>>>> and prepare the first RC around 20th of September, to try to get the > > >>> new > > >>>>>> release by the end of the month; how does it sound? > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Best regards, > > >>>>>> Ruben > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> [1] > > >>>>>> > > >>> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950 > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> On Wed, Sep 3, 2025 at 9:28 AM Stamatis Zampetakis < > > >> [email protected]> > > >>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> It is indeed a good time to start pushing for the 1.41.0 release. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> It appears that we don't have a RM yet but we can still continue > > the > > >>>>>>> discussion about the tickets that we would like to go in. Is there > > >>>>>>> anything in particular that we would like to merge before cutting > > >> the > > >>>>>>> first release candidate? > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> In the meantime if someone wants to serve as RM please speak up. > > >> It's > > >>>>>>> the first time after a while that we don't have anyone in the list > > >> of > > >>>>>>> volunteers so let's try to fix this. > > >>>>>>> 1.41.0: ? > > >>>>>>> 1.42.0: ? > > >>>>>>> 1.43.0: Stamatis Zampetakis > > >>>>>>> 1.44.0: ? > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Best, > > >>>>>>> Stamatis > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 6:14 PM Ruben Q L <[email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Hello, > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> It's been approximately 3 months since our last release [1]; if we > > >>> want > > >>>>>>> to > > >>>>>>>> keep our release rhythm, I think we should start the discussions > > to > > >>>>>>> produce > > >>>>>>>> a 1.41 in the next month or so. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> If I am not mistaken, our next release managers would be [2]: > > >>>>>>>> - Hongyu Guo > > >>>>>>>> - Jing Zhang > > >>>>>>>> @Hongyu, Jing: Are you still available to serve as RM in the > > >>> short/mid > > >>>>>>> term? > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Are there other volunteers who would like to join the RM list? > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Best regards, > > >>>>>>>> Ruben > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> [1] https://calcite.apache.org/news/2025/05/28/release-1.40.0/ > > >>>>>>>> [2] > > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/j847g5q8l2fq90xzr93bx69csj0srmsw > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > > > >
