+1 for starting with Groovy. It would be great to have a closer
collaboration between IPF [1] and Camel regarding Groovy (and eventually
other language) support. I could image that some of IPF's Groovy support
could be interesting to Camel user's as well like using closures for
processors, expressions, predicates etc [2], Groovy XML processing [3],
DSL extension mechanism (components/bundles can contribute to the
overall DSL) [4] or DSL extenders for OSGi [5] to mention some examples.

Any thoughts?

[1] http://gforge.openehealth.org/gf/project/ipf/
[2]
http://repo.openehealth.org/confluence/display/ipf/Core+features#Corefeatures-DSLextensionforexistingCamelfeatures
[3]
http://repo.openehealth.org/confluence/display/ipf/Core+features#Corefeatures-DSLextensionsforGroovyXMLprocessing
[4]
http://repo.openehealth.org/confluence/display/ipf/Core+features#Corefeatures-DSLextensionmechanism,
http://repo.openehealth.org/confluence/display/ipf/IPF+Guidelines#IPFGuidelines-DSLextensionsguide
[5]
http://repo.openehealth.org/confluence/display/ipf/OSGi+support#OSGisupport-Extenderbundles

Cheers,
Martin

Willem Jiang schrieb:
> +1 for starting with Groovy.
> Here are some links[1][2] which show some examples about using the
> Groovy with Camel.
>
> [1]http://gforge.openehealth.org/gf/project/ipf/
> [2]http://mrhaki.blogspot.com/2009/04/use-apache-camel-plugin-in-grails.html
>
> Willem
>
> Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>   
>> I think we should start with Groovy, Python and Ruby.  It's hard to
>> decide on priorities, every time I try to, I feel like changing the
>> order.  If you have a preference please let us know.  After we get the
>> AST it should be all the same.
>>
>> Btw, one of the first things we need to do is decide which of the 2
>> projects is of more interest to you so we would know how to rank it.
>>
>> You can find me (and others) online on the #camel channel at
>> irc.codehaus.org if you'd like to chat about it.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Hadrian
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Apr 6, 2009, at 9:55 AM, 宓学强 wrote:
>>
>>     
>>> I wonder which dynamic language should we add for the Dynamic route
>>> support,Groovy,Ruby,Python or Scala?
>>> Hope every one can give the opinion and we can negotiate to decide that.
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> 宓学强 allo...@gmail.com
>>>       
>>     
>
>   

Reply via email to