+1 on Groovy 2009/4/8 Martin Krasser <d...@martin-krasser.de>: > +1 for starting with Groovy. It would be great to have a closer > collaboration between IPF [1] and Camel regarding Groovy (and eventually > other language) support. I could image that some of IPF's Groovy support > could be interesting to Camel user's as well like using closures for > processors, expressions, predicates etc [2], Groovy XML processing [3], > DSL extension mechanism (components/bundles can contribute to the > overall DSL) [4] or DSL extenders for OSGi [5] to mention some examples. > > Any thoughts? > > [1] http://gforge.openehealth.org/gf/project/ipf/ > [2] > http://repo.openehealth.org/confluence/display/ipf/Core+features#Corefeatures-DSLextensionforexistingCamelfeatures > [3] > http://repo.openehealth.org/confluence/display/ipf/Core+features#Corefeatures-DSLextensionsforGroovyXMLprocessing > [4] > http://repo.openehealth.org/confluence/display/ipf/Core+features#Corefeatures-DSLextensionmechanism, > http://repo.openehealth.org/confluence/display/ipf/IPF+Guidelines#IPFGuidelines-DSLextensionsguide > [5] > http://repo.openehealth.org/confluence/display/ipf/OSGi+support#OSGisupport-Extenderbundles > > Cheers, > Martin > > Willem Jiang schrieb: >> +1 for starting with Groovy. >> Here are some links[1][2] which show some examples about using the >> Groovy with Camel. >> >> [1]http://gforge.openehealth.org/gf/project/ipf/ >> [2]http://mrhaki.blogspot.com/2009/04/use-apache-camel-plugin-in-grails.html >> >> Willem >> >> Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: >> >>> I think we should start with Groovy, Python and Ruby. It's hard to >>> decide on priorities, every time I try to, I feel like changing the >>> order. If you have a preference please let us know. After we get the >>> AST it should be all the same. >>> >>> Btw, one of the first things we need to do is decide which of the 2 >>> projects is of more interest to you so we would know how to rank it. >>> >>> You can find me (and others) online on the #camel channel at >>> irc.codehaus.org if you'd like to chat about it. >>> >>> Cheers >>> Hadrian >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Apr 6, 2009, at 9:55 AM, 宓学强 wrote: >>> >>> >>>> I wonder which dynamic language should we add for the Dynamic route >>>> support,Groovy,Ruby,Python or Scala? >>>> Hope every one can give the opinion and we can negotiate to decide that. >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> 宓学强 allo...@gmail.com >>>> >>> >> >> > >
-- Claus Ibsen Apache Camel Committer Open Source Integration: http://fusesource.com Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/davsclaus Apache Camel Reference Card: http://refcardz.dzone.com/refcardz/enterprise-integration
