Yes. I also think it was the right thing to do, but the wrong way... We should act with more respect for each other - independently whether or not we have different point of views.
... and as Claus always says: We love contributions... ;-) Best, Christian On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 5:58 PM, James Strachan <ja...@fusesource.com>wrote: > On 20 July 2011 16:43, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote: > > On Wednesday, July 20, 2011 8:47:19 AM James Strachan wrote: > >> Dan could you please explain why you're deleting pages from the wiki > which > >> describe open source camel components without first at least having a > >> discussion about it? > > > > Because in this case, there is nothing really to discuss. That page > CANNOT > > be hosted here. Period. It's not supported by the Apache Camel > project. > > It's not part of Apache Camel. Etc.... If the Scalate team would like > to > > create a page on their own site with information, we can create a new > "3rd > > party Camel Components" page or table or similar that provides a > (nofollow) > > link to their page, but Apache cannot provide hosting and such for > > documentation of external components. Alternatively, if they would like > to > > donate the Scalate component to camel, we could put it back for 2.9. I > can > > help out with the software grant needed. > > Don't you think it'd be a little nicer to just bring this discussion > up first rather than just going ahead and deleting stuff? If that page > has to move somewhere so be it - but please talk to folks first. > Deleting stuff without comment or discussion is pretty rude behaviour. > BTW no need to SHOUT > > -- > James > ------- > FuseSource > Email: ja...@fusesource.com > Web: http://fusesource.com > Twitter: jstrachan, fusenews > Blog: http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ > > Open Source Integration and Messaging >
