Hi In my mind, camel-morphia and camel-mongodb would be different components. Or perhaps the mongodb component could offer two modes of operation: raw MongoDB and Morphia.
For a first embracement of MongoDB, it seems more natural to implement a raw component which can handle at least the following MongoDB operations: insert, findOne, count, findAll, query, mapReduce, getStats, group, save, update, remove, updateMulti. Then we can start thinking about Morphia. Do you agree? Regards, Raúl. On 4 January 2012 09:35, Ioannis Canellos <ioca...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've used morphia a lot last year and I was very happy with it. However, I > think that we should not base a mongodb component on that. > > I think that we need a pure camel-mongodb component and we could have a > morphia dataformat or a separate morphia component. > > -- > *Ioannis Canellos* > * > FuseSource <http://fusesource.com> > > ** > Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com > ** > Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC > Apache Camel <http://camel.apache.org/> Committer > Apache ServiceMix <http://servicemix.apache.org/> Committer > Apache Gora <http://incubator.apache.org/gora/> Committer > Apache DirectMemory <http://incubator.apache.org/directmemory/> Committer > * >
