OK thanks. Actually, I know cherry-pick -x / cherry-pick -e pretty well ;)
I’m using it for a while when back porting from main to activemq-5.xx.x branches (and in bunch of others Apache projects) ;) Regards JB > Le 15 janv. 2022 à 06:51, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> a écrit > : > > I’m talking more about a general point orthogonal to this discussion. > > > When you back port commits. If you used git cherry pick -x > > I have a report to help track commits between branches. > > > > On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 11:50 PM JB Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: > >> Hi Clebert >> >> We know but these point here was more a discussion to the community if it >> makes sense to remove the component in 5.16.x. >> >> And actually it’s something we discussed in the original PR (I forgot): we >> agreed to remove on for coming 5.17.x releases. >> >> Regards >> JB >> >>> Le 14 janv. 2022 à 23:17, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> a >> écrit : >>> >>> you guys should use cherry-pick -x between main and 5.16.x >>> >>> >>> then you could use this type of reporting I'm generating for between >>> main and 2.19.x on activemq artemis. it's fairly helpful I think. >>> easier to manage what's missing between the branches... >>> >>> >>> let me know if you need some help using that..(although I'm not >>> available next week as I'm going out on a trip for a family issue) >>> >>>> On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 10:22 AM JB Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> Ok I remember the discussion now. >>>> >>>> Let’s keep it in 5.16.x and focus on 5.17.0 where it’s already removed. >>>> >>>> Sorry about the noise ;) >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> JB >>>> >>>>>> Le 12 janv. 2022 à 16:06, Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net> a >> écrit : >>>>> >>>>> Yes, I know: my point is also to remove from activemq-5.16.x >>>>> >>>>> If no objection, I will remove it from there. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Regards >>>>> JB >>>>> >>>>>> Le 12 janv. 2022 à 16:03, Matt Pavlovich <mattr...@gmail.com> a >> écrit : >>>>>> >>>>>> Hey JB- >>>>>> >>>>>> I already removed it from 5.17.0 (main) >>>>>> >>>>>> -Matt >>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Jan 12, 2022, at 4:16 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> >> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ActiveMQ provides activemq-camel component. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This component is "old" (using Camel 2.25.x) and has been replaced >> by camel-activemq and/or camel-jms. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I propose to remove ActiveMQ Camel from the ActiveMQ code. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thoughts ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>> JB >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Clebert Suconic >> >> -- > Clebert Suconic
