The report would be helpful then.

On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 1:13 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net>
wrote:

> OK thanks.
>
> Actually, I know cherry-pick -x / cherry-pick -e pretty well ;)
>
> I’m using it for a while when back porting from main to activemq-5.xx.x
> branches (and in bunch of others Apache projects) ;)
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> > Le 15 janv. 2022 à 06:51, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> a
> écrit :
> >
> > I’m talking more about a general point orthogonal to this discussion.
> >
> >
> > When you back port commits.  If you used git cherry pick -x
> >
> > I have a report to help track commits between branches.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 11:50 PM JB Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Clebert
> >>
> >> We know but these point here was more a discussion to the community if
> it
> >> makes sense to remove the component in 5.16.x.
> >>
> >> And actually it’s something we discussed in the original PR (I forgot):
> we
> >> agreed to remove on for coming 5.17.x releases.
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> JB
> >>
> >>> Le 14 janv. 2022 à 23:17, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com>
> a
> >> écrit :
> >>>
> >>> you guys should use cherry-pick -x between main and 5.16.x
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> then you could use this type of reporting I'm generating for between
> >>> main and 2.19.x on activemq artemis. it's fairly helpful I think.
> >>> easier to manage what's missing between the branches...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> let me know if you need some help using that..(although I'm not
> >>> available next week as I'm going out on a trip for a family issue)
> >>>
> >>>> On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 10:22 AM JB Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Ok I remember the discussion now.
> >>>>
> >>>> Let’s keep it in 5.16.x and focus on 5.17.0 where it’s already
> removed.
> >>>>
> >>>> Sorry about the noise ;)
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards
> >>>> JB
> >>>>
> >>>>>> Le 12 janv. 2022 à 16:06, Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net> a
> >> écrit :
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Yes, I know: my point is also to remove from activemq-5.16.x
> >>>>>
> >>>>> If no objection, I will remove it from there.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>> Regards
> >>>>> JB
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Le 12 janv. 2022 à 16:03, Matt Pavlovich <mattr...@gmail.com> a
> >> écrit :
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Hey JB-
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I already removed it from 5.17.0 (main)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -Matt
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Jan 12, 2022, at 4:16 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
> j...@nanthrax.net>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hi all,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> ActiveMQ provides activemq-camel component.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> This component is "old" (using Camel 2.25.x) and has been replaced
> >> by camel-activemq and/or camel-jms.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I propose to remove ActiveMQ Camel from the ActiveMQ code.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thoughts ?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Regards
> >>>>>>> JB
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Clebert Suconic
> >>
> >> --
> > Clebert Suconic
>
> --
Clebert Suconic

Reply via email to