Hi Brandon, I would like you feedback on my two ideas for implementing mufti tenancy with the existing implementation. Would those be possible to implement?
Thanks, Indika >>>>> Two vague ideas: (1) qualified keyspaces (by the tenet domain) (2) multiple Cassandra storage configurations in a single node (one per tenant). For both options, the resource hierarchy would be /cassandra/ <cluster_name>/<tenant name (domain)>/keyspaces/<ks_name>/ On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 11:44 PM, Brandon Williams <dri...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 11:39 AM, indika kumara <ind...@apache.org> wrote: > > > *Multi-tenancy* > > > > I noticed that you are implementing multi-tenancy [1]. Could you please > > guess that how long it would take to finish to the remaining work? I > would > > like to contribute to that. However, I am a newbie to the Cassandra. > > Therefore, I do not know how much time it may take to do such a > > contribution. > > > > I think it's safe to say that effort is now dead. Everyone who cared about > it has changed employers. > > Would it be possible to support multi-tenancy (work around) with existing > > implementation? > > > Yes, doing it in the application layer is the only thing that makes sense > to > me right now. Having a few hundred memtables isn't reasonable. > > -Brandon >
