On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:33 PM, indika kumara <indika.k...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Hi Brandon, > > I would like you feedback on my two ideas for implementing mufti tenancy > with the existing implementation. Would those be possible to implement? > > Thanks, > > Indika > > >>>>> Two vague ideas: (1) qualified keyspaces (by the tenet domain) (2) > multiple Cassandra storage configurations in a single node (one per > tenant). > For both options, the resource hierarchy would be /cassandra/ > <cluster_name>/<tenant name (domain)>/keyspaces/<ks_name>/ > (1) has the problem of multiple memtables (a large amount just isn't viable right now.) (2) more or less has the same problem, but in JVM instances. I would suggest a) not trying to offer cassandra itself, and instead build a service that uses cassandra under the hood, and b) splitting up tenants in this layer. -Brandon
