On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 1:21 PM, paul cannon <p...@datastax.com> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Eric Evans <eev...@acunu.com> wrote: > >> There are also some matters of work-flow or process that we need to >> hashed out. For example, how do we handle reviews now? Do we >> continue to mandate/recommend/allow rebasing? >> > > Surely we'd want to follow normal git practices here: rebasing is almost > never appropriate once a branch is pushed to a public repo, where other > people might have gotten it. > > Where you might rebase a plain patch series on top of new developments in a > target SVN branch, you probably just ought to merge the target git branch > into your topic branch instead. Same effect, but retains history.
This would be my preference as well. -- Eric Evans Acunu | http://www.acunu.com | @acunu
