> > Perhaps if others want to explicitly encourage the 3.0->3.11->4.0 upgrade > path, we can split our resources accordingly? >
Would it be necessary to go from 3.0 to 3.11 on the way to 4.0? I didn't think that was required.
> > Perhaps if others want to explicitly encourage the 3.0->3.11->4.0 upgrade > path, we can split our resources accordingly? >
Would it be necessary to go from 3.0 to 3.11 on the way to 4.0? I didn't think that was required.