So does that mean I never can rely on injecting, and must always have a insurance of default injectable interface implementation in my code?
2010/5/27 Andrus Adamchik <[email protected]> > Not to the unit tests inheriting from CayenneCase and friends. Unit tests > were always bootstrapped in their own way, even in the past (mostly for > performance reasons). However if you need to define mock services, etc. via > IoC this can be done with a great deal of flexibility. E.g. see > DataDomainProviderTest.java, DefaultDataSourceFactoryLoaderTest.java and > other tests in the same package. > > Andrus > > > > > On May 27, 2010, at 9:21 AM, Andrey Razumovsky wrote: > > Hi Andrus, >> >> Are new 3.1 DI "modules" (CayenneServerModule) bound to Cayenne bootstrap >> process? At least, I don't think they are when we're running JUnit tests. >> Or >> otherwise, how to "turn on" injecting? >> >> -- >> Andrey >> > > -- Andrey
