Are we still talking about unit tests? Can you give an example of what
you are trying to accomplish?
Andrus
On May 27, 2010, at 10:33 AM, Andrey Razumovsky wrote:
So does that mean I never can rely on injecting, and must always
have a
insurance of default injectable interface implementation in my code?
2010/5/27 Andrus Adamchik <and...@objectstyle.org>
Not to the unit tests inheriting from CayenneCase and friends. Unit
tests
were always bootstrapped in their own way, even in the past (mostly
for
performance reasons). However if you need to define mock services,
etc. via
IoC this can be done with a great deal of flexibility. E.g. see
DataDomainProviderTest.java,
DefaultDataSourceFactoryLoaderTest.java and
other tests in the same package.
Andrus
On May 27, 2010, at 9:21 AM, Andrey Razumovsky wrote:
Hi Andrus,
Are new 3.1 DI "modules" (CayenneServerModule) bound to Cayenne
bootstrap
process? At least, I don't think they are when we're running JUnit
tests.
Or
otherwise, how to "turn on" injecting?
--
Andrey
--
Andrey
