DataDomain is injectable of course. Haven't looked at injection at the
level of SQLActions yet, so don't have an answer.
Andrus
On May 27, 2010, at 11:16 AM, Andrey Razumovsky wrote:
Once I implemented BatchQueryBuilderFactory and used an ugly hack
needed to
move it from DataDomain down to Cayenne internals. I think I could
make that
code cleaner using injection..
2010/5/27 Andrus Adamchik <[email protected]>
I think at some point we will reorg the unit tests to be based on a
DI
stack. Need to think about a good design for this...
In the meantime, can you be more specific - which class will have
that
injectable var? Maybe it can be initialized without injection?
And on a general note, in Cayenne not all stack objects are created
via
injection. Either by design (there has to be some level of
granularity at
which DI stops and where an object can decide on its own on how to
initialize its composite state) or because we haven't switched them
yet. DI
enabled are the high-level stack objects (DataDomain), and common
user
extension points, such as DbAdapter or DataSourcFactory.
Andrus
On May 27, 2010, at 10:42 AM, Andrey Razumovsky wrote:
No. in main Cayenne code, I want to add injectable var and put code
that
injects default implementation in CayenneServerModule. But that
wouldn't
work at least for unit tests, since injection does not get invoked
there.
What's the best way to fix the situation?
2010/5/27 Andrus Adamchik <[email protected]>
Are we still talking about unit tests? Can you give an example of
what
you
are trying to accomplish?
Andrus
On May 27, 2010, at 10:33 AM, Andrey Razumovsky wrote:
So does that mean I never can rely on injecting, and must always
have a
insurance of default injectable interface implementation in my
code?
2010/5/27 Andrus Adamchik <[email protected]>
Not to the unit tests inheriting from CayenneCase and friends.
Unit
tests
were always bootstrapped in their own way, even in the past
(mostly for
performance reasons). However if you need to define mock
services, etc.
via
IoC this can be done with a great deal of flexibility. E.g. see
DataDomainProviderTest.java,
DefaultDataSourceFactoryLoaderTest.java
and
other tests in the same package.
Andrus
On May 27, 2010, at 9:21 AM, Andrey Razumovsky wrote:
Hi Andrus,
Are new 3.1 DI "modules" (CayenneServerModule) bound to Cayenne
bootstrap
process? At least, I don't think they are when we're running
JUnit
tests.
Or
otherwise, how to "turn on" injecting?
--
Andrey
--
Andrey
--
Andrey
--
Andrey
