+1. Thanks for the efforts, Jiashu! Best Regards, Yu
On Wed, 29 May 2024 at 13:55, Xintong Song <[email protected]> wrote: > > Big +1! Thanks for bringing this up, Jiashu. > > From my experiences with Apache Flink / Paimon, the wiki-based proposal > management works quite well. > > Another important improvement that I see in the CIP process is that it > enforces a public discussion and a formal vote on mailing list for > important changes to the project. I think this is a good practice of > open-communication and consensus decision making of the Apache Way. > > Best, > > Xintong > > > > On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 11:19 AM rexxiong <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hello, Celeborn community, > > > > In the past, when Celeborn introduced new major features or significant > > changes, we typically used Google Docs to launch proposals. However, a > > major issue with Google Docs is the difficulty in centrally managing these > > proposals. Therefore, after referring to other communities and based on > > discussions with several PMCs offline, it appears that Apache Confluence > > could be a viable alternative for our needs. With that in mind, I would > > like to invite all of you to share your thoughts, experiences, and > > preferences regarding the use of Apache Confluence versus Google Docs for > > our proposal management. Your feedback will be invaluable in helping us > > make an informed decision that best meets the needs of our community. > > > > Meanwhile, I have archived previous proposals and written the Celeborn > > Improvement Proposal (CIP) process > > < > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CELEBORN/Celeborn+Improvement+Proposals > > > > > on Confluence. > > > > What do you think? Looking forward to your thoughts on this proposal. > > > > > > Thanks, > > Jiashu Xiong > >
