The 3 that caught my eye were: rcmet rcmet ui rcmet
As to what they should be instead I don't know. 'rcmet ui' could easily be 'ocw ui' without loss of clarity. With the refactoring I don't know what we want to call 'rcmet' and 'rcmed' doesn't seem like it needs to be there at all, so I don't know if we need to think of an alternative. -- Joyce On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (398J) < [email protected]> wrote: > Can you be more specific and propose e.g., : > > A1->B1 > A2->B2 > .. > > Where A is the set of "JPL/RCMES centric" names and B is the new > proposed one? > > Cheers, > Chris > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > Senior Computer Scientist > NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 > Email: [email protected] > WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department > University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Joyce <[email protected]> > Reply-To: "[email protected]" > <[email protected]> > Date: Friday, August 16, 2013 9:31 AM > To: dev <[email protected]> > Subject: JIRA component names > > >Some of our JIRA components are very JPL/RCMES-centric. What does everyone > >think of switching these over to something more generic? Ideas on names? > > > >-- Joyce > >
