Perfect Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 16, 2013, at 10:49 AM, "Michael Joyce" <[email protected]> wrote: > If people need to catch up on the refactoring that's been occurring they > can find the original proposal for refactoring at [1]. The full thread > where this was discussed can be found in the mail archives at [2]. The wiki > entry that Mazi made detailing proposed package layouts (including the one > we ultimately went with) is available at [3]. > > To summate: > > The old code (which was called RCMET) is being refactored into the ocw > package with the intention of making the code base more maintainable and > the API nice and pretty. > > Hopefully this is sufficiently verbose. I don't have the time to go into > more detail at the moment. If anyone is confused feel free to ask away and > I'll try to elaborate later!! > > Thanks > Mike > > > [1]: http://s.apache.org/RKI > [2]: > https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-climate-dev/201306.mbox/browser > [3]: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLIMATE/Open+Climate+Workbench+API+summary > > > -- Joyce > > > On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (398J) < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Can you detail "the refactoring" so everyone on the list here knows what >> you are talking about? >> >> A few paragraphs would be great, Mike, thanks. >> >> Cheers, >> Chris >> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. >> Senior Computer Scientist >> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA >> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 >> Email: [email protected] >> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department >> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Michael Joyce <[email protected]> >> Reply-To: "[email protected]" >> <[email protected]> >> Date: Friday, August 16, 2013 10:07 AM >> To: dev <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: JIRA component names >> >>> The 3 that caught my eye were: >>> >>> rcmet >>> rcmet ui >>> rcmet >>> >>> As to what they should be instead I don't know. 'rcmet ui' could easily be >>> 'ocw ui' without loss of clarity. With the refactoring I don't know what >>> we >>> want to call 'rcmet' and 'rcmed' doesn't seem like it needs to be there at >>> all, so I don't know if we need to think of an alternative. >>> >>> >>> >>> -- Joyce >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (398J) < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Can you be more specific and propose e.g., : >>>> >>>> A1->B1 >>>> A2->B2 >>>> .. >>>> >>>> Where A is the set of "JPL/RCMES centric" names and B is the new >>>> proposed one? >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Chris >>>> >>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. >>>> Senior Computer Scientist >>>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA >>>> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 >>>> Email: [email protected] >>>> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ >>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department >>>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA >>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Michael Joyce <[email protected]> >>>> Reply-To: "[email protected]" >>>> <[email protected]> >>>> Date: Friday, August 16, 2013 9:31 AM >>>> To: dev <[email protected]> >>>> Subject: JIRA component names >>>> >>>>> Some of our JIRA components are very JPL/RCMES-centric. What does >>>> everyone >>>>> think of switching these over to something more generic? Ideas on >>>> names? >>>>> >>>>> -- Joyce >> >>
