1 follow up question : 2) And #66 Live migration - Live migration of Vms which are associated with anti-affinity group failing - The live migration will still succeed since it is Admin's choice to use host2 even if it is not suitable. We just indicate if the host is suitable or not, but CS should not stop Admin from live migrating.
>> Vm migration in such cases will succeed. But when Vms are stopped and >> started , it will fail to start since the anti-affinity group check will >> fail ? -Thanks Sangeetha Thanks Sangeetha -----Original Message----- From: Prachi Damle [mailto:prachi.da...@citrix.com] Sent: Monday, April 08, 2013 1:57 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [ACS42][QA]Test Plan for "Affinity / Anti-affinity Rules" Hi Sangeetha, The test plan looks fine. A few comments 1) UpdateVMAffinityGroup API - We should add to the testcases, the scenario where an already existing VM say on host1, is updated to have affinity group A1 that asks to avoid host1. In this case, the VM cannot restart on host1, but should start on some other host within or outside cluster. 2) And #66 Live migration - Live migration of Vms which are associated with anti-affinity group failing - The live migration will still succeed since it is Admin's choice to use host2 even if it is not suitable. We just indicate if the host is suitable or not, but CS should not stop Admin from live migrating. Prasanna, Affinity Group Processing is a pre-planning step. It will set the scope for the deployment planners, there is no conflict between the planner strategies and affinity groups. These are separate steps of deployment planning. Thanks, Prachi -----Original Message----- From: srivatsav.prasa...@gmail.com [mailto:srivatsav.prasa...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of prasanna Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 6:24 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [ACS42][QA]Test Plan for "Affinity / Anti-affinity Rules" On 4 April 2013 10:40, Sangeetha Hariharan <sangeetha.hariha...@citrix.com> wrote: > Test cases for " Affinity / Anti-affinity Rules" is posted here - > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Test+Paln+for+Affinity-Anti-affinity+Rules. > > > > Reference FS: - > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/FS+-+Affinity-A > nti-affinity+groups > > There are planning decisions that are controlled in the global settings that do similar things as do affinity groups. UserConcentration and UserDispersion are two kinds of allocators that affect planning decision very similar to affinity and anti-affinity. Some cases surrounding the conflicts arising from these settings would need to be added. Rest of the tests look good given that the scope of the feature is only a single anti-affinity processor at this time.
