On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi < animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > On Apr 11, 2013, at 10:33 PM, "Marcus Sorensen" <shadow...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > One thing I'd like to point out, and perhaps its merely subjective, > > > but it seemed like from initial 4.1 feature freeze to a week or two > > > before the rc was supposed to be cut there wasn't much action on bug > > > fixing. It wasn't until the deadlines started becoming imminent that > > > people came back to work on 4.1. Just something to keep in mind when > > discussing extending deadlines. > > > > Certainly the urgency does set in closer to deadlines. > > > [Animesh>] Marcus I did further analysis and it points out that there was > constant activity in defect fixing since the code freeze date and matches > up closely with defect creation. Please see attached graph. > > > Can you put the graph on your people space or somewhere else, the list strips attachments. --David
