> > >
> > >
> > > On Apr 11, 2013, at 10:33 PM, "Marcus Sorensen"
> > > <shadow...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > One thing I'd like to point out, and perhaps its merely
> > > > subjective, but it seemed like from initial 4.1 feature freeze to
> > > > a week or two before the rc was supposed to be cut there wasn't
> > > > much action on bug fixing. It wasn't until the deadlines started
> > > > becoming imminent that people came back to work on 4.1. Just
> > > > something to keep in mind when
> > > discussing extending deadlines.
> > >
> > > Certainly the urgency does set in closer to deadlines.
> > >
> > [Animesh>] Marcus I  did further analysis and it points out that there
> > was constant activity in defect fixing since the code freeze date and
> > matches up closely with defect creation. Please see attached graph.
> >
> >
> > Can you put the graph on your people space or somewhere else, the list
> strips attachments.
> 
[Animesh>] Our  emails crossed, I just posted sharefile link, next time on I 
will put it in my apache space

Reply via email to