I just realized that I did close the 4 month / 6 month thread [1] in favor of 4 months but forgot to update this thread.
So the conclusion is we will stick to the original called out schedule ============================= 4.2 detailed schedule proposal: ============================= 2013-05-31 Feature Freeze All new feature need to have been merged into master by this date. Release branch will be cut on this date. Jenkins updated to include new release branch builds. 2013-06-01 through 2013-06-30 Testing/Bug Fixes (testing against jenkins artifacts) Documentation Finalization 2013-06-30 Docs Freeze (except release notes and translations) Release Branch moves to limited updates only (only commits allowed in would be release blockers fixes, translation updates, etc...) 2013-07-01 through 2013-07-22 Translation Development and Integration (should be ongoing, but focused effort) Final regression testing / bug fixes / doc fixes 2013-07-22 4.2.0-RC1 is created, and project level VOTE is called I have updated the release page [2] and setting up 4.2 Release Dashboard [1] http://markmail.org/message/3ctdwor5hfbpa3vx [2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Cloudstack+4.2+Release Thanks Animesh > -----Original Message----- > From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] > Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 1:21 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: [ASFCS42] Proposed schedule for our next release > > Joe thanks for bringing this up and noting that the subject may not have got > everyone's attention. I will start a separate thread on 4 month v/s 6 month > > Animesh > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Joe Brockmeier [mailto:j...@zonker.net] > > Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 12:49 PM > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [ASFCS42] Proposed schedule for our next release > > > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013, at 04:50 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > > Based on the community discussions of having 4 month cadence I am > > > proposing the following schedule: > > > > We seem to have gone off the rails into a 4-month vs. 6-month > > discussion. It's been a week since the original schedule discussion > > started and we're in the VOTE for 4.1.0, so it might be good if we get this > discussion wrapped up. > > > > I'm +1 on the schedule Animesh proposed initially. If we're going to > > talk about a six-month cycle seriously, we should probably have a new > > thread that makes it clear to anyone skimming the dev@ mailing list. > > > > Best, > > > > jzb > > -- > > Joe Brockmeier > > j...@zonker.net > > Twitter: @jzb > > http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
